Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Some may agree that technology makes children less active. I, however, disagree with the author's argument. Technology has always been good to either children or adult.
To begin with the technology has assisted the children in education. My 5 year old nephew, who is studying in kinder-garden can fluently speak in English just by seeing the videos on YouTube. He also has a exceptional communication skills than other children on the class who are not very used to with mobile phones and technology. Moreover, the technology has assisted the children for the fast learning. For example, the children on the remote area of Nepal like Rolpa these days are able to get good grades on the secondary level conducted by national education board just by getting the online class through the medium of internet. Those children used to have the poor grades on the secondary level, as a result they were not able to compete with the city children. However, the scenario has been changed with the technology.
Secondly, technology has provided the access to children to built their art and skills. For example, the children are able to see the different kinds of dance and songs with the help of television. So, child from Nepal can practice the dancing steps performed on Italy.
Some may argue that technology have actually made the children lazy by stating that they are these days indulged on the online games like PUBG, mobile games instead of outdoor games. To state this mean to neglect the whole positiveness that technology have helped children to be more active.
Thus, above all clearly states that technology have helped children to be active more than in past without the use of technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | hesam_75 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Tharwat | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | star435 | 66 | view |
- The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. 68
- The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. 66
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 80
- "Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions. The buildings were erected by different construction companies — Alpha and Zeta. Although the two buildings had identical floor plans, the buil 53
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'agrees'.
Suggestion: agrees
Some may agree that technology makes children less act...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...s active. I, however, disagree with the authors argument. Technology has always been go...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...eing the videos on YouTube. He also has a exceptional communication skills than o...
^
Line 3, column 792, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the city children. However, the scenario has been changed with the technology. ...
^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
... steps performed on Italy. Some may argue that technology have actually made the ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 285.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98596491228 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53300770615 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.4957714007 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8125 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285854702397 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100670455054 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611165999281 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161246792499 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586240753266 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.