The table below presents the number of children ever born to women aged 40-44 years in Australia for each year the information was collected since 1981. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Number of children ever born, Women aged 40–44 years
A glance at the figure provided reveals the number of children that were born by female at the age between 40 and 44 from 1982 in Australia.
Overall, it is crystal clear that the percentage of women aged 40-44 years who born two children was the highest among four years.
From 1981 to 2006, it is evident that the proportions of female without child, had one child and had two child were increasing. The families that did not have child had risen from 8.5 percent in 1981 to 15.9 percent in 2006, similarly, the women who had one child leaped to 13.2 percent in 2006 from 7.6 percent in 1981. Meanwhile, the proportion of females who had two children accounted for 29 percent in 1981, followed by around ten percent increase in 2006.
In a sharp contrast, the portion of women with three children and four or more children witnessed downward trends. Decreased by nearly 6%, 27.4 percent of women born three kids in 1981, whereas, with 21.5 percent in 2006. From 27.6 percent in 1981 declined to 11 percent in 2006, the proportion of women who raised four or more kids saw a falling trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | happyhappy | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-05 | Milan karki | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-11 | Nurbakyt2oo1 | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-07 | Tracyabc | 73 | view |
| 2016-09-26 | Thien | 67 | view |
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 78
- It is inevitable that as technology develops so traditional cultures must be lost. Technology and tradition are incompatible - you cannot have both together.To what extent do you agree with this view? 61
- Some people believe that the government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both the views and give you 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 106, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'child' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'children'.
Suggestion: children
...ithout child, had one child and had two child were increasing. The families that did ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65816326531 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29516994604 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520408163265 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.2022726206 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.125 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149621552346 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848305974616 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649560102322 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12761524368 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673790622046 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.