TPO 23 integrated writing
In the lecture, the professor asserts that the reasons behind the decline in the yellow cedar trees are still unknown. This refutes the reading, which states that there are three possible theories explain this decline.
First, the lecturer mentions that healthy yellow cedar trees are more resistant to damage caused by insects because they have strong chemical in their bark that protect them from beetle attack. She explained, also, that bark beetle attack only weak yellow cedar trees, which will die with or without the infection. This contradicts the article, which cites that the yellow cedar decline may be caused by insect parasites.
Second, although brow bears could cause damage to yellow cedar trees, the same rate of decline is happening in areas that do not contain bears, like islands. This weaken the theory, which proposes that bears are behind this decline in the yellow cedar population. On the other hand, the reading states that brow bear aggressive eating habits could have caused this reduction.
Finally, the speaker claims that if the frosting roots caused the decline in the yellow cedar trees, we should see most of the trees die in the elevation, where it is cold; however, most of the decline happened in low elevation areas, where it is warm. This challenges the article, which mentions that gradual changes of climate may be the cause of the decline.
- TPO 20 3
- TPO 35 integrated essay 3
- TPO 20 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only do what they know how to do well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 61
- TPO 26 integrated writing 76
- TPO 43 integrated essay 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the same rate of decline is happening in areas that do not contain bears, like is...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10043668122 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15845127813 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541484716157 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.326525332 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.8 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.460832700573 0.272083759551 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188540513428 0.0996497079465 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498234955177 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27264514416 0.162205337803 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537955421482 0.0443174109184 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.