Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water. Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Never in history are natural resources disappearing at such alarming rate as in this modern society. As human’s population is booming each year, people’s requirements are also increasing. We need more food, more fresh water, more places to live, which will result in the extinction of many essential and sometimes irreplaceable resources. From my viewpoint, it’s very crucial to save forests from the threat of disappearing because maintaining forests can save the other two natural resources namely water and animals.
There are many reasons why forests should not be damaged. To commence with, forests are the only shelter for a variety of fauna and flora which are vital resources for zoology and botany. Once making up about 40 percent of the world’s land area, forests are disappearing at an alarming rate. It is estimated that the world lost 1.3 million square kilometers of forest from the year 1990 to 2016. Secondly, due to whirlwind industrialization and urbanization, many forests are cut down in order to get open spaces. If this detrimental scenario continues, the endangered animals like white tigers, rhinoceros, orangutan will die out soon. For that reason, saving forests is important.
Also, forests are known as the Earth’s lungs as they control environmental problems. For example, a leafy tree is estimated to produce a day's supply of oxygen for two to ten people. Furthermore, trees bring rain to the Earth and maintain the fresh water level for all species. In some areas of India, where forests have been destroyed since 2015, people are traumatically suffering from drought. More than 80% of districts in the states of Karnataka and 70% in the state of Maharashtra have been declared drought affected. Consequently, they do not have water to cultivate crops and for daily needs. In addition to this, by slowing the flood flows, forests help the ground absorb more of the flash flood, avert soil erosion and property damage. Finally, it is lucrative for economy of a nation if forests are carefully maintained. In the country like India and China, for instance, all precious and scarce medicines to cure disease come from ancient forests like Himalaya.
To recapitulate, forests are treasures that should be preserved for their beauty and functionality. Deforestation must be seriously considered and promptly puzzled out by government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | Châu Cương Chí | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Châu Cương Chí | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | januszhangzhang | 73 | view |
| 2014-11-23 | eddysuaib | 75 | view |
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.Why do you think this is happening?What can government do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? 61
- It is often said that the subjects taught in schools are too academic in orientation and that it would be more useful for children to learn about practical matters such as home management, work and interpersonal skills. 84
- Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water. Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 84
- Some people believe that the responsibility for the protection of the environment is by a transnational organization, rather than by each individual country. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the disadvantages and advantages for young people who decide to do this. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Never' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
Never in history are natural resources disapp...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2015.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30263157895 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93664756005 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623684210526 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8005111581 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5909090909 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2727272727 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111613140329 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0355986092514 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458017939549 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759643721144 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521128777236 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.