TPO 48 integrated writing
The reading discusses that the population of frogs has decreased around the world and the author listed three factors to solved the problem. However, the speaker finds all the solutions dubious and presents some evidence to refute all of them.
First, the reading passage points out that pesticide is a possible reason and the utility of it must be prevented. In contrast, the speaker casts doubt on this issue and states that from economical aspects, it is not fair. Besides, farmers in this area will confront severe disadvantage, in other words, they will lose their crops in comparison to other farms in different areas.
Furthermore, the reading proposes that fungus has caused the skin of these frogs to thicken and they could not absorb water so the infected frogs will die. Hence, we can use some treatment to prevent infection. On the contrary, the speaker declares that doing treatment on a large scale is strongly hard. Also, they will pass infections to the next generation and its cost is too much. Thus, this solution is rebutted.
Last but not least, the author indicates that because they lay their eggs on the water, humans' excessive use of water and their activity are threatened their habitat. On the other hand, the lecturer mentioned that water using does not have a tremendous effect on global warming and distribution to extinct this animal. As a result, it is unlikely they have a positive effect on preventing the decline of the frogs' population
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents' jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents' jobs.Use specific reasons and examples to supp 76
- TPO 50 integrated writing 3
- TPO 51 3
- TPO 55 7
- TPO 54 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... much. Thus, this solution is rebutted. Last but not least, the author indicates...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, thus, in contrast, as a result, in other words, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1232.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96774193548 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50031215533 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588709677419 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5483375873 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7692307692 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0769230769 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2307692308 7.06452816374 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343727744041 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10208257185 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104086007352 0.0662205650399 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184749724406 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0991622987025 0.0443174109184 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.