Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects,like philsophy and history and only offer practical degree courses that maximise chance of employment to what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued by a few people that universities should only focus on practical subject courses, due to limited job opportunities and expensive tertiary education. I partially agree with this statement, which I will explain in the following paragraphs.
To start with, in this contemporary world, as the population is on the rise, there are fewer places left for graduates. Every sector witness unemployment as there are myriad of candidates applying for a particular position. Thus, studying pragmatic subjects, such as accountancy, management or finance, is a proactive step to secure the future. To exemplify, a lot of students are motivated to pursue commerce to make sure they won't be jobless in the future as this sector is on the rise to accommodate ever-increasing candidates. In addition, certain degree's like philosophy and history have no relevancy in this technologically advanced world. These subjects are reduced to books only, can not be applied to the real world.
In contrast, although the pragmatic degree course provides benefits in the near future, arts courses can help in a better decision in life. Philosophy renders better analytical skills which help a person to take the right steps before commencing. Likewise, history teaches us about our previous generation, such as work patterns and their modification throughout the decades. Moreover, these subjects improve writing skills to further increase the chance of acquiring the job. For example, lots of companies hire people on the basis of their analytical and language ability to communicate better and taking the right decision in given circumstances.
To conclude, while practical degrees are relevant to future requirements, learning arts enhances interpersonal skills. Both subjects are crucial
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Jaspreet Kanda | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | Jaspreet Kanda | 67 | view |
- Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects,like philsophy and history and only offer practical degree courses that maximise chance of employment to what 67
- Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects,like philsophy and history and only offer practical degree courses that maximise chance of employment to what 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in contrast, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53284671533 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07699515688 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649635036496 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9189779515 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.066666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158156613029 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427567799753 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403682474022 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868704544707 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155497072489 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.