Nowadays children are consuming too many sugar-based drinks. What are the reasons and the solutions for this situation?
An addiction of drink is need of hour for some children. A plethora of teenagers are using a plenty of sugar-based drinks in the contemporary era. This essay will discuss why is happening and put forward several solutions for this issue.
In modern times, children are tacking a huge amount of drink, which based on sugar, because some worthwhile reasons. First and foremost paramount reason is advertisement of drinks. A wast of companies are bombarding on social network or media, and children are attracting and learning from there. For example, Coca-Cola, which is famous industry for this type of drinks, is marketing their products on TV; therefore, children are encouraging and tacking Pepsi, when they are playing the outdoor games. Second reason that It is easily available in the market, so children are easily buying from shops at up-to-the-minute.
In the way of solutions, government and law enforcement agencies should apply higher taxes on the sugar-based drinks. In this case, children do not have ample money for brought the drinking products; as a result, they are reducing to use of sugar-based products. Second way, government should not give permission to selling this product to the under age limit ( less than 18 ages’) people. If seller gives sugar- based drink to the bellow eighteen aged person, both (seller and buyer) give some penalty to the government. Third way that parents and schools are requiring to explain toxic effects to the children. If school gives one lecture per week for motivate to the children, we can reduce this problem.
In conclusion, children are consuming significantly sugar-based drinks. This essay explained why this nasty habit increasing and given some solutions for tackling this situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-07 | Marywonderlaw | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country 64
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- Many goverments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, and the protection is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Should students be allowed to choose which classes they take, or should they be required to take the same classes as everyone else?What are the advantages and disadvantages of each approach to education?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevan 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ling this product to the under age limit less than 18 ages' people. If selle...
^^
Line 5, column 457, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
...based drink to the bellow eighteen aged person, both seller and buyer give some penalt...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 573, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'explaining'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: explaining
... that parents and schools are requiring to explain toxic effects to the children. If schoo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, therefore, third, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25622775801 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80263514288 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612099644128 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4550771839 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3125 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37116505481 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123891175338 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741882334066 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250120755882 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619832064637 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.