People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
It is often said that people who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision-makers. It holds that for certain situations, one should make a calculation, by whichever method is appropriate to the situation, to determine the best possible choice. However, some situations do not have quantifiable metrics by which to compare choices and some decisions, no matter how seemingly logical they may be, are not chosen because they will not make us happiest. How a choice makes one feel is a valid qualitative metric that should not be ignored when making decisions and a person who takes this into consideration is not illogical.
Let's take, for example, the decision of where to attend college. There are some quantifiable metrics one can take into account: cost of attendance, ranking, student body size, or even the number of eateries on campus. There are also qualitative metrics that are entirely subjective and can play a role in decision-making, for example, how one feels when visiting the campus. If a person has a choice between otherwise identical two schools, the choice is often made to go to the most affordable option. However, one might decide to go to the more expensive school, as they feel more at home on one campus and feel they would be unhappy at the other. This does not necessarily indicate a poor decision-maker or an illogical person. It indicates a person who holds certain values as more important than others.
While decisions such as where to attend college can be made using objective quantitative data and subjective qualitative data based on emotion, some decisions can only be made using emotion as sometimes one lacks information or time to make a methodical, calculated choice. The ability to make quick decisions under pressure without full information while relying mainly on instinct is an important skill throughout the animal kingdom. The statement that those who make decisions based on emotion incorrectly assumes that all emotion is illogical and that all situations can be evaluated with objective data.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 66
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...to consideration is not illogical. Lets take, for example, the decision of wher...
^^^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t are entirely subjective and can play a role in decision-making, for example, ho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 13.6137724551 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 28.8173652695 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 55.5748502994 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 2260.96107784 78% => OK
No of words: 343.0 441.139720559 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15160349854 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90336854575 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 204.123752495 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533527696793 0.468620217663 114% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 705.55239521 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8286521499 57.8364921388 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.214285714 119.503703932 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 23.324526521 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92857142857 5.70786347227 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.15768463074 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405153355848 0.218282227539 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157176597351 0.0743258471296 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.228151595415 0.0701772020484 325% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290062328101 0.128457276422 226% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140326252722 0.0628817314937 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.3799401198 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.3550499002 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.5979740519 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 98.500998004 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.