Nowadays Television has become an essential part of life. Medium to spread news & awareness and for some, it acts like a companion. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of Television occupies an important place in our life and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of providing entertainment is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that social developments can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, television newscasts are an informative medium of communication can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of effects on the public opinion, as well as enhancing knowledge, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the correlation between watching educational channels and boosting visual learning. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both news broadcast and increasing information about news apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, considering television as a friend might increase the consequences of being addicted. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of distracting people from feeling lonely could relate to this reality that the demerits of decreasing social relationships pertain to the abundant attachment to characters. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of attention on psychological needs is correlated directly with spending huge amounts of time watching TV. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of time-wasting.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of watching TV channels far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of news programs prove the significance of media as the source of information, but also pinpoint the impact of media on solace implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Behnaz fallah | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | gosha bhullar | 11 | view |
| 2019-06-06 | neethujithin | 85 | view |
| 2019-05-24 | Rahul Luthra | 70 | view |
| 2019-05-24 | Rahul Luthra | 55 | view |
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this change 88
- If Voting is compulsory in a democratic society what conclusions can we draw about Nature of democracy 85
- In social situations some people believe that it is better to be a good listener than a good talker Do you agree or disagree 64
- What is your view on the idea that it takes failure to achieve success 88
- There are numerous after class activities for students Is it good or not 94
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70568561873 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3335003668 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 139.433497537 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648829431438 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7276985788 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.166666667 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105807581318 0.242375264174 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0318808571378 0.0925447433944 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374121597021 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0546293256551 0.151781067708 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037648916785 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.9 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.