People nowadays are used to disposable items meaning that they use things for short time and throw them away. What do you think is the cause of this and what problems can it lead to?
Throughout recent years, people, in general, got used to throwing away their items after a short period of use, relatively to the past. There are a lot of factors which caused this and the consequences of this, nowadays common, practice can be harmful to our environment and society.
As a result of our technological and manufacturing advancements, the production of disposable things has never been higher. Today, for example, an average person has numerous sets of clothes which he can wear every day, and most of those clothes get thrown away after a year of use. Shopping for clothes, among other things, has become a weekly habit for most of the population. In comparison, about 100 years ago, an average person had only two or three suits to wear and was buying new ones quite rarely. People became more materialistic and are not happy with the things they already own. Due to this, they will buy more things than they need while spending large sums of money.
Consequently, large scale manufacturers are making products which are of a much lesser quality than before. They exploit people’s greed additionally contributing to the problem of disposing of items, because items will not last as long anyways. This leads to a wide variety of problems. Firstly, a large amount of toxic waste is created, which damages natural environments. Furthermore, we have severe cases of large and famous companies abusing third world countries’ labors, in order to produce as many goods as cheaply as possible while harming basic human rights.
In conclusion, human morals have been violated as well as the natural environment, due to the obsession and carelessness of most of today’s population. People are focused on what will they wear and what car will they drive, instead of dealing with important problems concerning our whole society and our planet ecosystem’s health itself.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | stefan ielts | 84 | view |
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Nowadays parents are sending their children on trips abroad for educational purposes. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 89
- The graph below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006. 67
- Restrictions On Ownerships Of Mobile Phones 67
- Some people think that the development of technology helps to reduce crime, while other people think it encourages crime. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ter a year of use. Shopping for clothes, among other things, has become a weekly ...
^^
Line 5, column 501, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...s to wear and was buying new ones quite rarely. People became more materialistic and a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, so, third, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in general, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17096774194 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87631976675 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638709677419 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9637237891 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.866666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275975156683 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755691518472 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636394016938 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152350877247 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637870454549 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.