TPO 53
The reading discusses the benefit of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products and the author listed three reasons to support this idea. However, the lecturer finds these reasons challenging and presents some evidence to refute all of them.
First, the author mentioned that by increasing the taxes, people are discouraged from continuing to use them. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this idea and asserts that it does not decrease necessarily the amount of consumption. People low-quality products that have more harmful effects and greater risks. As a result, by enhancing the tax, people have to spend less money on their health because they continue to do their habit.
In addition, the author points out that it is fair, due to the fact that they get sick as a result of smoking or using an unhealthy product. Therefore, they create medical costs. On the contrary, the speaker casts doubt on this issue by standing that it is unfair as higher and low earning are addicted to these products, increasing the taxes put burden duty on a smaller income.
Finally, the reading passage proposes that it provides revenue for the government to use it for the benefit of public welfare. On the other hand, in direct contradiction to the reading passage, the professor claims that the government instead of earning a million dolors through taxes can prevent smoking in some public and private places to help people. Hence, it is not an appropriate way to increase income.
- TPO 52 3
- TPO 26 integrated writing 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- TPO 19 integrated writing 65
- TPO 25 integrated writing 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 412, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... an appropriate way to increase income.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, however, so, therefore, in addition, in contrast, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1248.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03225806452 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57547049236 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3887047835 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.