Both poor and rich find accessibility into university difficult. Do you agree or disagree?
University education is a basic requirement to get a decent job. Some people argue that it is difficult for students to get admission into a good university, regardless of their financial background. This essay will discuss why I believe that for students from wealthy families it is easy to get admitted to a university, but why it is more difficult for teenagers from poor families to enter a college.
Taking birth into an affluent family has its benefits, and getting admission into the desired university is one of them. All universities have management quota in which seat can be confirmed after submitting a donation. Thus, it becomes difficult for poor students, whereas for affluent students it is easy to submit donations and get a confirmed seat. On the top that, affluent families often have good relations with politicians because of which it becomes easier for them to crack the procedure.
Conversely, high school pass-outs with destitute often struggle to get the admission. They face tough competition from peers from affluent backgrounds, who have access to facilities. For instance, in India, there are various coaching centres to help students to crack the competition exam, not to say these centres charges cannot be bear by poor people. Besides this, poor students often rely on financial-aid from different institutions, in the absence of which it becomes difficult for them to pay the fees.
In conclusion, I believe that admission to the university is difficult for only students from a poor background. However, for students from affluent background it is easy to get admission into any university.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Adilrahi | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Ekjot Singh | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | malveer | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Harrynguyen1980 | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Jaydev Patel | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, conversely, however, if, so, thus, whereas, as for, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23574144487 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94347172433 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532319391635 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6944846959 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.923076923 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132605794784 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059169312742 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409871546885 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958261013059 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159487996466 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.