a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college
Our Elders usually instruct us to a king of the deck rather than the jack of all trades however modern competitive reality seems to support the jacks much better than the kings. Enforcing students evrywhere in the nation through similar set of routine may turn out to be quite ineffective for the development of their skills.
When it comes to studying variety is the key when it comes to overall polishing of a student's skills, it is well documented that students who are put through curriculum with diverse applications have a much higher chance of honing their overall IQ. This is due to the challenge it brings to the table as rarely any students can be a jack of a jack of all trades thus forcing the brain to adapt and learn new patterns and methods to further augment their neural network.
Exposure to these diverse fields lead to students developing unique skills and thus promoting different sectors opportunities, as a nation will benefit from advancing all their disparate branches to develop such as business, sciences or art etc. Also if students were to train in a single discipline this will limit their areas of favourable opportunities, for example- A curriculum not focussed on art will surely affect students looking to enter college of photography, sculpting etc.
Furthermore it could lead to frustation in children who have worked hard to get good grades in Chemistry or Physics but failed to get a good understanding of economics if it is not included. A student looking to advnace their career in Archaeology will be very frustated when their understanding of the field they wish to pursue is blinkered. This frustation could turn into depression which is going to affect the generation that is going to lead us into tomorrow and these shoulders should be strong and firm, this practice will only affect them severely.
Even if we were to adapt this practice and made students to learn the same subjects all over, what happens when they interact will other students at international level or apply for jobs in a foreign land? They will be at a clear disadvantage when it comes to being protean , which is demanded when it comes to higher level competitiveness at the international level. Producing the best engineers in the world may seem like a great monetary idea but if they fail to understand basic economics, all the money will run out before they know it.
The idea has a positive motivation behind it and is appreciable as development of the most basic subjects like science is vital, as these are respectable subjects when it comes to logic development and reasoning skills. However a better way would be to make these subjects as a major focus but still have other subjects for the complete development of a perfect student.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-22 | MistyRabbit | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...llege of photography, sculpting etc. Furthermore it could lead to frustation in children...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 274, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...advantage when it comes to being protean , which is demanded when it comes to high...
^^
Line 11, column 221, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...logic development and reasoning skills. However a better way would be to make these sub...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, still, thus, well, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 28.8173652695 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 55.5748502994 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2302.0 2260.96107784 102% => OK
No of words: 471.0 441.139720559 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88747346072 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77286724024 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 204.123752495 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509554140127 0.468620217663 109% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 705.55239521 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.8473053892 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.0946242758 57.8364921388 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.428571429 119.503703932 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.6428571429 23.324526521 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.70786347227 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192399884 0.218282227539 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620240679884 0.0743258471296 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450784722196 0.0701772020484 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889804168675 0.128457276422 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489835579136 0.0628817314937 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 14.3799401198 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 48.3550499002 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.197005988 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.5979740519 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 98.500998004 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 12.3882235529 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.1389221557 136% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.9071856287 160% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.