The reading students do on their own is as important than that assigned by their teachers.
With the unprecedented development of the culture industry, a large source of books is provided for students in different phases of life. Competitions in today’s society are becoming increasingly fiercer which acquires students to assimilate books of various types. Some people support the notion that reading books that are assigned by teachers are of the greatest importance, considering that teachers can filter out books that suit students most. However, As far as I concerned, students should do their reading on their own.
First, blessed with an opportunity to choose the books they love arouses their curiosity, which would definitely kindle their interest in reading and gaining useful knowledge that is not supposed to be taught in the classroom. Just as the saying goes “Books are the best teachers of mankind.” Students are not identical individuals, thus their preference could never be the same, which indicates that students could have totally different views about some articles or ideas. A history book might be fascinating to some students, the rest might find them unsatisfying, instead. If a student is only equipped with a mind with a tunnel vision, his interest and potential could never be sparked.
Second, given the freedom of choosing books for themselves, the student could have access to a wider range of books. More concretely, when students are making their reading lists, it is unavoidable for them to compare different books and estimate which one has the higher value, which needs students to read a lot and think a lot. With time passing and social change, students’ receptive abilities have seen better days. Choosing what they would actually love to read constructs an enjoyable environment for students, which could evoke their passion for doing so. The more books they read, the better they understand the reading material, also, they would definitely read faster, in that case. The ability to do an extensive reading is of great importance in the university stage for any students, seeing that a large number of books and materials were to be read in such a short time, students without this ability could feel much more stressful.
Admittedly, teachers are experts in their field, they have a better judgment than students. As adults, teachers might filter out inappropriate contexts for students, however, what they thought being not suitable could be wrong. Students would lose the opportunity to observe the world by themselves under teachers’ choices. Frankly speaking, no limits should be impulsed on students while they are trying to explore the unknown by themselves.
In brief, by taking into account all the aforementioned reasons, it seems that the selection of books and magazines according to the students' interest is a rational strategy. For sake of the brevity, two main reasons should be reiterated. First, students’ interest and potential will be evoked. Moreover, their horizon will be widen as long as they do their reading on their own. That is why this strategy is recommended for all the students.
The reading students do on their own is as important than that assigned by their teachers.
With the unprecedented development of the culture industry, a large source of books is provided for students in different phases of life. Competitions in today’s society are becoming increasingly fiercer which acquires students to assimilate books of various types. Some people support the notion that reading books that are assigned by teachers are of the greatest importance, considering that teachers can filter out books that suit students most. However, As far as I concerned, students should do their reading on their own.
First, blessed with an opportunity to choose the books they love arouses their curiosity, which would definitely kindle their interest in reading and gaining useful knowledge that is not supposed to be taught in the classroom. Just as the saying goes “Books are the best teachers of mankind.” Students are not identical individuals, thus their preference could never be the same, which indicates that students could have totally different views about some articles or ideas. A history book might be fascinating to some students, the rest might find them unsatisfying, instead. If a student is only equipped with a mind with a tunnel vision, his interest and potential could never be sparked.
Second, given the freedom of choosing books for themselves, the student could have access to a wider range of books. More concretely, when students are making their reading lists, it is unavoidable for them to compare different books and estimate which one has the higher value, which needs students to read a lot and think a lot. With time passing and social change, students’ receptive abilities have seen better days. Choosing what they would actually love to read constructs an enjoyable environment for students, which could evoke their passion for doing so. The more books they read, the better they understand the reading material, also, they would definitely read faster, in that case. The ability to do an extensive reading is of great importance in the university stage for any students, seeing that a large number of books and materials were to be read in such a short time, students without this ability could feel much more stressful.
Admittedly, teachers are experts in their field, they have a better judgment than students. As adults, teachers might filter out inappropriate contexts for students, however, what they thought being not suitable could be wrong. Students would lose the opportunity to observe the world by themselves under teachers’ choices. Frankly speaking, no limits should be impulsed on students while they are trying to explore the unknown by themselves.
In brief, by taking into account all the aforementioned reasons, it seems that the selection of books and magazines according to the students' interest is a rational strategy. For sake of the brevity, two main reasons should be reiterated. First, students’ interest and potential will be evoked. Moreover, their horizon will be widen as long as they do their reading on their own. That is why this strategy is recommended for all the students.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The reading materials chosen by students on their own is more important than those assigned by their teachers 73
- The reading students do on their own is as important than that assigned by their teachers With the unprecedented development of the culture industry a large source of books is provided for students in different phases of life Competitions in today s socie 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: AS_ADJ_AS[1]
Message: Comparison is written "as important 'as'".
Suggestion: as
...tudents do on their own is as important than that assigned by their teachers. Wit...
^^^^
Line 7, column 811, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ity stage for any students, seeing that a large number of books and materials were to be read in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, frankly, however, if, moreover, second, so, thus, while, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2669.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 509.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24361493124 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72900108784 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.499017681729 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 781.2 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7383737479 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.208333333 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2083333333 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.481826326407 0.236089414692 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151353522605 0.076458572812 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128292122003 0.0737576698707 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.310805135295 0.150856017488 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162033661819 0.0645574589148 251% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.