In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society?
Recently, the effects of increased older people population on society has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the positive and negative consequences of it? Whereas it is a widely held view that it is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the general perspective standpoint, older generation is bound up inextricably with old-aged people, which indicates it leads to both social and economic side effects. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between retirement age and working age as well as an exponential increase in ageism. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of pension groups is correlated positively with not only unemployment but also assurance facility.
Within the realm of socioeconomic term, without the slightest doubt, older people attribute to medical facility, in that it would come down to health center, hospital care, and chronic illness. A salient example of such attribution is family income, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take care giving behavior for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint economic down turn problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to pension right, nursing home, and even professional medical cost. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of government for job opportunity.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the negative effects of increasing older people population are outweigh its positive effects. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-21 | bordbarkhoo | 80 | view |
| 2020-02-21 | bordbarkhoo | 80 | view |
| 2020-02-21 | yasamin62 | 80 | view |
| 2020-02-21 | yasamin62 | 80 | view |
| 2020-02-21 | yasamin62 | 80 | view |
- In many countries the proportion of older people is steadily increasing Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society 80
- As global trade increases many daily necessities are produced in other countries Is it a good or bad trend 11
- In many countries the proportion of older people is steadily increasing Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
... increasing older people population are outweigh its positive effects. However, with the...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61744966443 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04921864357 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681208053691 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2701809243 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.769230769 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180138437049 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488921960932 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675771174939 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111429999225 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722370076069 0.0609392437508 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.