The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007.
The line graph illustrates about male and female graduates of a Canadian university over a 15-year period, starting in 1992.
Overall, it can be seen that female graduates were always higher than male graduates. However, both of the number of male and female graduates were increased during the period.
Looking at the date set of female graduates in more details, it is evident that at the beginning of the time period the number of female graduates were accounted by approximately 99000, and then it is increased slowly till 1995 and reached at 11000. After this year, the number of female graduates were declined by 100. At the end of the time period the number of female graduates were increased dramatically and reached at the peak point, and that figure was around 150000.
Turning to the males’ data set, it is clear that the number of male graduates were fluctuated from 1992 to 2002 at a figure of around 72000, and then it was increased gradually in 2006, and that figure was about 95000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 92 | view |
| 2023-03-31 | thucuc | 55 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | eyraen | view | |
| 2022-01-26 | anhphan2511 | view |
- The line graph shows the number of books that were borrowed in four different months in 2014 67
- The two diagrams are the maps of a library The first is of the library in 1990 and the seconds is of how it looks at present in 2017 87
- The bar chart below gives information about the number of students studying Computer Science at a UK university between 2010 and 2012 86
- The diagram below shows the typical stages of consumer goods manufacturing including the process by which information is fed back to earlier stages to enable adjustment 67
- The line graph shows immigration to USA Canada and Australia from 1990 to 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84971098266 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49247589733 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485549132948 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6769050034 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.857142857 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191841655675 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110090299513 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443278381748 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134808495309 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384549227691 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.