Claim: No act is done purely for the benefit of others.
Reason: All actions — even those that seem to be done for other people — are based on self-interest.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The statement alleged that no action has been done to benefit others and the reason claimed all of them is for self-benefit. Although I agree with the spirit of the message, I could not accept it as it is due to overgeneralizing the situations. Moreover, both claim and reason have some flaws which I explain now.
The claim maintains that there is not any action to benefit others purely and all what we have done is for ourselves. It could not be tur all of the time and in all of the situation. We have heared about soldiers who sacrifised their life for the country. For example, in war between Iran and Iraq, some soldeirs went to an oversee mission which they knew they would not come back but they decided to do due to be sure others safety.
The reason also has a problem which mentions all of the actions are done for self interest. Apart from overgeneralizing the situation, the term self-interest might provide some fallacious. Some people sacrifise all of their lives for others. Take mothers as an example, they spend thier time which could use for pleasure and rest for caring their children and they may limit their leisure to assure their children success and health. Therfore, they do not these actions for self-interest, they just concern about their children and their interest.
Finally, though the claim and the reason overgeneralized the situation and did not consider for exceptions, I believe the statement would be reasonable and reliable if the author change some phrase. I reckon most of the time individuals have done actions for self-advantage and it could not be true for all of the time. For example, when we make a friend we might think about benefit that we can get from that person or even maybe we just like him or her for pleasure. In both situations, we have done this actions due to self-interest.
In conclusion, I believe the claim and reason are reasonable but they did not consider all of the situations and overgeneralization may destroy them. It could be better to change the gerneral words to some specific situations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | seoul_milk | 83 | view |
| 2021-11-05 | amyabt | 58 | view |
| 2021-08-01 | Sumanayana | 50 | view |
| 2020-11-04 | yomi idris | 58 | view |
| 2020-09-23 | invisible_string | 75 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 58
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 58
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep th 54
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'overgeneralize'?
Suggestion: overgeneralize
..., I could not accept it as it is due to overgeneralizing the situations. Moreover, both claim an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 138, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e is for ourselves. It could not be tur all of the time and in all of the situation. We ha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 161, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...could not be tur all of the time and in all of the situation. We have heared about soldier...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 321, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...en Iran and Iraq, some soldeirs went to an oversee mission which they knew they would not ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...eason also has a problem which mentions all of the actions are done for self interest. Apa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 303, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...-advantage and it could not be true for all of the time. For example, when we make a frien...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...re reasonable but they did not consider all of the situations and overgeneralization may d...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, may, moreover, so, apart from, for example, i reckon, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 359.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76044568245 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78445105017 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473537604457 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6083863268 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9444444444 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9444444444 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363787216687 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137562673378 0.0831039109588 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10241614527 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227153806062 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812711105554 0.0667264976115 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.