the table below highlights data on the number of travelers using three major british airports between 1998 in 2003
The table compares three main airports in British in terms of the number of commuter who used over the period 6 years
Overall, there was an upward trend in the number of people using different British airports. The most popular airport in the UK was Gatwick during the period shown
In 1998, about 36.5 million travellers annual year used Gatwick airport, which was over twice times as much as that of Stansted airport. By contrast, approximately 27.2 million commuters were seen in Heathrow airport. Over the following 3 years, British witnessed a significant increase of around 21 million travellers in Heathrow airport and this figure took over that of Gatwick airport in 2000.
From 2000 to 2003, a substaintial growth was seen in the number of people who used Gatwick airport and the figure reached a peak at nearly 70 million travellers in 2003. After hitting the highest point , the number people using Heathrow airport decreased by just under 4 million travellers in 2003. By 2003, the figure for Stansted airport had considerably climbed to roughly 43 million travellers
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-26 | thiên định | 84 | view |
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 73
- Studies have suggested that children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to reduce the time children spend on watching TV and encourag 73
- Task2 Some people think success in life comes from hard work and determination Others think money and appearance are more important Discuss both sides and give your opinion 71
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- The graph below compare changes in the birth rates of china and the us between 1920 and 2000 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table compares three main airports in British in terms of the number of com...
^^
Line 2, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ears Overall, there was an upward trend in the number of people using different ...
^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... was over twice times as much as that of Stansted airport. By contrast, approxima...
^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tnessed a significant increase of around 21 million travellers in Heathrow airpor...
^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...in 2003. After hitting the highest point , the number people using Heathrow airpor...
^^
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...climbed to roughly 43 million travellers
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07262569832 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55818705095 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558659217877 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8362528439 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.714285714 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.285714285714 5.23603664747 5% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325722482811 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164880315958 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693527952333 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210325700864 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584635847612 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.