Online shopping is increasing dramatically. How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of job required?
In recent years, online shopping is more popular ever than before. This trend has positive effects for the environment and jobs in the short run, but it may do many detrimental impacts in the long terms.
In terms of the environment, online shopping has both positive and negative impacts. The proliferation of online shopping helps to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide from privacy transports. For example, in the past, people had to go to the fashion shop when they wanted to buy clothes and fashion items. Meanwhile, nowadays, due to the advanced technology, people can stay at home and order a great deal of items from clothes to costumer products via the Internet. That leads to reduce the petrol fuels for the car ownership. In contrast, the proliferation of online shopping leads to overconsumption and overspending. People tend to purchase many unnecessary items which can be wasted as quickly as come. The more waste ending up in landfills means the higher pollution in the environment.
In positive terms of jobs, online shopping creates various jobs and more employment opportunities, such as online grocery personal shoppers and delivery drivers. However, in the long term, the growth of online shopping can lead to the bankruptcy of many traditional retailers. The number of jobless people might outnumber the number of starts-up people based on the development of online shopping. The high unemployment rate might put heavy pressure on national budget as well as leads to many crimes to make a living.
In conclusion, online shopping has many positive impacts on the environment and the labor market, however, in the long terms, the benefit might be overshadowed by negative consequences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-18 | whitedaisy1704 | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-18 | whitedaisy1704 | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-07 | Chang_highlight | 61 | view |
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries line bar 67
- Today large shopping centers and supermarkets are more common than small local shops Is this a negative or positive development 61
- Some people think that news has no connection with people s lives so it is a waste of time to read newspaper and watch television news programmes Do you agree or disagree 84
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from five organizations 87
- The graph below shows Long Term International Migration in UK 1999 2008 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17328519856 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88042304524 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548736462094 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.870936641 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180870065123 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640604864711 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545450196352 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126448103093 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406811161444 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.