Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in some say that music. There is a widespread that will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one's life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life can not contribute to but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead. as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
There are, however, some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. The primary one stems from the fact that by conserving the aforementioned trend, people have not only realised its gravity, but also gauged the magnitude of its repercussions when it comes to today's ever-changing lifestyle.Besides, its impact on is far-reaching indeed. Hence, it is apparent why many are against some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite some drawbacks, the benefits of some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-22 | preetdhillon30 | 75 | view |
| 2020-07-22 | preetdhillon30 | 75 | view |
| 2020-07-21 | aidasadr | 88 | view |
| 2020-03-09 | manraj123 | 85 | view |
| 2018-04-16 | payamesp2 | 88 | view |
- children brought up in families with less money are better prepared 77
- different types of music 77
- The information revolution has changed the ways of mass communication and had some negative and positive effects on individuals’ lives as well as on society. 11
- experiment learning is better than formal learning 77
- Which should require more financial support from the government health or education To what extent do you agree or disagree use your experience 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ll only lead to a myriad of concerns in ones life. However, I do not entirely accept...
^^^^
Line 3, column 559, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...l these merits stand one in good stead. as far as augmenting their chances of pros...
^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e learning in children life. The primary one stems from the fact that by conservi...
^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Besides
...comes to todays ever-changing lifestyle.Besides, its impact on is far-reaching indeed. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83277591973 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77900863722 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471571906355 0.580463131201 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.9939233682 50.4703680194 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.416666667 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.25397266985 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391939481019 0.242375264174 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161901159324 0.0925447433944 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.190331485622 0.071462118173 266% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266826893101 0.151781067708 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114084441206 0.0609392437508 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.