The Graph shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart illustrates the data on the changes in the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) which produced by people in four countries over a five-year period. Overall, the considerable upward trends have been experienced in the volume of greenhouse gases in, Italy and Portugal, while the downward trends have been seen in UK and Sweden over the period in question. Also it is obviously seen that the individuals in UK and Sweden emitted the highest tones greenhouse gases rather than people in Italy and Portugal.
Looking at the detail, the measured volume of carbon dioxide in UK museum started at 11 tonnes in 1967 and declined to 10 tonnes in 1987, then slightly dipped and reached 9 tonnes in 2007.
The dramatically decline has been depicted in the amount of carbon dioxide in Sweden, subsequently the trend initiated at 9 tonnes by 1987, after that jumped to 10 tonnes and significantly decreased to 5 tonnes in 2007.
Regarding Italy and Portugal, the trend of masses of atmosphere air emissions in these countries were similar, however the criteria of amount are varied. The amount of CO2 has been commenced at 4 tonnes in 1967, after that this figure grew steadily to 6 tonnes in 1977 and 7 tonnes in 1997, after that Italy witnessed stable by 2007.
Portugal reached the lowest amount (1 tonnes) of emissions in 1967 and the museum witnessed a rapid increase to 5 tonnes in 2007.
To sum up the UK produced the largest amounts of greenhouse gas throughout the period in question, in contradistinction to Portugal, where a person emitted the least amounts of CO2.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-13 | Lily Ha | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | pr1nce | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Huwan Diamonds | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | anhminhbnvn1 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | anhminhbnvn1 | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that watching television is bad for children Other people believe that watching television is educational for children Which opinion do you agree with and why Give specific details and examples in your answer 71
- The Graph shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give your 68
- Social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter are observed to have more negative effects than positive being more useful for the criminals than others To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and incl 61
- The best way to solve world s environmental problem is increase the cost of fuel Do you agree or disagree and give your own opinion 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 363, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...and Sweden over the period in question. Also it is obviously seen that the individua...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, regarding, so, then, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 270.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84444444444 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72055630557 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481481481481 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 393.3 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 27.9514570393 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.333333333 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14395587511 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693998496882 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0204422107136 0.0843802449381 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842537384282 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0143548444113 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.