Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? How can its popularity be increased?
Environment protection is vital to modern life and cycling is believed to be an effective way to realize it. Nonetheless, for many, cycling is simply not their transportation form of choice. This essay shall examine several reasons for this and suggest a number of remedies.
I believe there are two primary reasons behind why riding bicycle has not been a prevailing way of commuting in many areas across the world. Studies indicate that perception of road safety has the most significant role to play. While a car user is to some extent protected by the car’s steel chassis and frame, a cyclist’s protection is limited to some basic protective gears such as helmets or knee guards. Therefore, should an accident between a car and a cyclist happen, the cyclist will suffer substantially more. Another drawback that non-cyclists often cite is cycling is weather-dependable. To illustrate, bicycles do not provide riders with protection from such unfavorable weather conditions as heavy rain or snow. People are also reluctant to utilize bicycles for traveling for practical reasons such as parking, security, and navigation.
Commuting by bicycle can be encouraged by a number of ways. First, it is imperative for local governments to assign more bike lanes and that stricter punishment is applied to vehicle users who invade them. This assures cyclists that the government cares about their safety and, hence, ameliorate their confidence in road safety. In addition, improvement in cycling infrastructure and cycling safety training carried out by local governments will certainly contribute to safer road traffic. Second, despite cycling’s dependence on weather, reliable weather forecasts can reduce cyclists’ frustration and increase their desire to bring out their bicycles. Also, given that cycling is healthy for both people and the environment, propaganda and education in this direction will surely involve more people in making use of bicycles in their daily commute.
To conclude, if adequate effort is poured into improving road safety, producing higher quality weather forecast, as well as enhancing people’s environmental awareness, more people will consider bicycles as their primary means of transportation.
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 92
- Some people think that the news media nowadays have influenced people s lives in negative ways To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places How can its popularity be increased 89
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socializing online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 84
- Some people think that the news media nowadays have influenced people s lives in negative ways To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54518950437 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01586835337 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626822157434 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.641466629 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.882352941 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128906985548 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431302961741 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403339753961 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0791653180112 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376914248637 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.