The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5
European countries from 2000 to 2012
The line chart illustrates the proportion of female individuals of parliament in 5 European countries between 2000 and 2012.
It can be seen that all of those countries witnessed an increase in the number of female members over the time frame. UK has the lowest figure in the early of the period while that for Germany was the highest in 2000.
To begin with, female members in the UK only accounted for about 3% of those working in the parliament in 2000 but that figure climbed sharply over the period. With regard to Belgium, the percentage of female individuals of parliament was 6 times as high as that of the UK. However, after a 12-year period, both countries were predicted to share the similar proportion of approximately 24%.
There was an exchange in the positions of Germany and Italy at the end of the time frame. Germany started the period with the percentage of 34%, nearly 10% more than that of Italy. In contrast, in 2012, more female members worked for the Italy parliament than those in Germany, at around 38% and 36% respectively. The figure for France in 2000 was just under that for Italy and it was anticipated to rise by 7% after 12 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | kashyap sahil | view | |
| 2023-04-11 | kashyap sahil | view | |
| 2020-06-13 | CiaraNguyen | view | |
| 2020-05-15 | Munn Nguyen | 90 | view |
| 2020-05-15 | Hường Nguyễn8 | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012 56
- It is observed that in many countries, not enough students are choosing to study science subject. What are causes? And what will be effects on society? 67
- Some believe that going to college is the best way to a successful career while others believe that it is better to start working after graduating from high school Discuss these two views and give your opinion 73
- nowadays, more and more people decide to study abroad. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend? 84
- Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, while, in contrast, to begin with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64734299517 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56820427106 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51690821256 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.7 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.2 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28122632512 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118606019886 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114219713555 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214368999637 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119609732014 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.