People spend alot of money on various things as they earn more money nowadays than before is it a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

People spend alot of money on various things as they earn more money nowadays than before . is it a positive or negative development?

Undoubtedly, advancements in the economies of nations have revolutionised the lifestyle of denizens and also has raised the standard of living. In this current scenario, markets are flooded with variety of products which entice the potential buyers to spend more. Although this phenomenon is playing pivtol position for the survival of countries but still its unpropitious impacts on the price bands of commodities can not be overlooked along with this it is accountable for production of solid waste.

Since with the evolution of industralisation, purchasing power of people have surged manifold that instigate them to have more aspirations consequently excessive consumption of goods. Seemingly, in order to accomplish market targets producers manifacture things at large scale and supply the same to consumers to earn gains. Afterward, this irrational consumption pattern creates the materialistic waste in inevitable manner which invariably contributes for pollution. It would be biased to bypass the data published by World Trade Organisation stating that the most eminent terriotry Japan where per capita income of an individual is almost 2500 dollars inflicting from the hassel of undisposeable material rubbish.

To continue, another main reason is that demand and price has direct relationship which means with the augmentation in demand level, expected hike in price bands is certain. The whole circumstance leads to the situation of inflation in the market that deprives the underprevilaged people from buying necessties of life. Uncontrolable vicious circle takes the hold on entire economy and creates the hassel for lower class of people. To exemplify, as per the research of UNESCO Keynia holds least place in the index of self-sufficient nations because of higher death rates in comparison of other countries.

To conclude, even though this practice equip folks with employment opportunities and provide them wages to sustain a better life but untoward results on the economy cannot be neglected. Despite the fact such prevailing habits are going to escalate with the rise in personal disposable income, avoiding unnecessary expenditure can improve the conditions.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-04-27 somu 58 view
2020-03-18 somu 11 view
2020-03-18 purinavdeep@gmail.com 67 view
2020-03-18 somu 11 view
2020-03-18 purinavdeep@gmail.com 84 view
Essays by user somu :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 484, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'holds the least'.
Suggestion: holds the least
...y, as per the research of UNESCO Keynia holds least place in the index of self-sufficient n...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...expenditure can improve the conditions.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, look, so, still

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64242424242 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09701713775 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660606060606 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.9706307259 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.230769231 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3846153846 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38461538462 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0551919319122 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0186459242631 0.084324248473 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0259975309577 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0293988702131 0.151304729494 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229663502686 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.0 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.