Cycling is a healthier and more environmentally-friendly form of transport. Nevertheless, cycling is getting less popular. What are the reasons of this trend? What can be done make cycling more popular.
The unpopularity of bicycles in numerous places has been brought into question though there is a little doubt about its being environmentally friendly. There are two main reasons for this trend and several feasible solutions could be implement to motivate the usage of bicycles.
There are two underlying explanations why bicycles are not prevalent in many places. First, since it certainly takes considerable amount of time and effort to commute to work or anywhere else by bicycles, people would rather use their own cars or other means of transport, which means that they could save lots of time and energy. This is because it fails to benefit city dwellers of major metropolises when their pace of working life would eclipse the values of using bicycles to the environment. Secondly, due to the fact that cars are considered to be luxurious, many people opted to use cars instead of bikes so that they could attain more respect and admiration. Obviously, in a society that judges the personal status of the individual so much by their material worth, it is therefore difficult not to follow the trend by buying cars rather than really being concerned about the negative impact these vehicles would inflict on their surroundings.
The government plays a vital role in encouraging the use of this environmentally friendly vehicle. First, if city councils town could provide more bicycles lanes throughout town and cities, residents will find it easier to change the habit and cycle on a regular basis. In fact, offering cycling lanes would offer greater safety to residents using their bikes. Second, by encouraging people to reduce their footprint and gas emissions through TVs or other media, authorities could increase the likelihood of people turning to cycling.
In conclusion, both governments and residents should join their hand in increasing the utilization of bikes so that everyone will take action on global warming, resulting in a sustainable and dynamic development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-01 | Kien Vu | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-28 | huynhthinhu | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-10 | Narges.s | 89 | view |
| 2020-11-30 | ngoanvu | 85 | view |
| 2020-07-07 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 79 | view |
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required 89
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- Cycling is a healthier and more environmentally friendly form of transport Nevertheless cycling is getting less popular What are the reasons of this trend What can be done make cycling more popular 89
- Nowadays most people try to balance between work and other parts of lifes Unfortunately not many achieve this balace What are the problems of this Suggest some solutions to solve the problem Suggest some solutions to solve the problem 84
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is this the case Is it a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...efit city dwellers of major metropolises when their pace of working life would ec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.225 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78654692227 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596875 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.6379546217 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.333333333 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121284629952 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452168722671 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360990016337 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0681511825845 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453061890816 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.