Advertisements are becoming more and more common in our everyday life. Is it a positive or negative development?
There has been a growing tendency for advertising and people are overwhelming as it appears to be more common in our life from on the internet to television. There are both liabilities and utilities to this, though overall, it is a welcome development. This essay will first demonstrate that this development leads to more job opportunities and a higher living standard, followed by an analysis of the primary disadvantage, namely how it could lead to an increasingly materialistic society, is not valid.
From a social point of view, a booming advertising industry brings a myriad of merits. A genuinely prominent claim to deliberate is that the unemployment rates would be lower. The rationale behind this is that the bigger this creative industry is, the more job opportunities are there, stem from logo designer to commercial film director. The Times recently reported that advertising is the second largest industry in Korea. What further amplifies the argument expressed above is that the development of advertisements leads to a better living standard. This borne by the fact that people could aware of the choices that they have, therefore, they could compare different products on sale and choose an item at the most reasonable price. According to the PEW Center, 56% of Vietnamese people agreed that advertisements inform them about a greater array of selections.
A separate school of thought, however, suggests that the rise in the number of advertisements could lead to an increasingly materialistic society; however, this is not accurate. A logical justification for this is that advertisements frequently use celebrities to promote brand images and associate those with higher status, thus, people are persuaded that buying a product would make them feel happier. Yet, despite this fact, it still inferior to the advantage discussed.
Subsequently, weighing all the aforementioned, it can be safely stated that the bombard of advertisements can be advantageous to society as it helps people approach a better range of options and reduce unemployment rates, and although it can sometimes be a contributing factor to a materialistic society, it is a very crucial part in the growth of economic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | vidung | 89 | view |
| 2024-08-24 | Tuan Harry | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-18 | MEBC Class | 80 | view |
| 2024-07-12 | MEBC Class | 75 | view |
| 2024-07-11 | trần ngọc tuấn | 67 | view |
- Some people advocate death penalty for those who committed violent crimes Others say that capital punishment is unacceptable in contemporary society Describe advantages and disadvantages of death penalty and give your opinion 78
- Some people think job satisfaction is more important than job security But others believe that people can not always enjoy their jobs and having a permanent job is more important Discuss both view and give your opinon 84
- Traffic congestion is becoming a huge problem for many major cities Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce traffic in big cities 78
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in our everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 92
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...mentioned, it can be safely stated that the bombard of advertisements can be advantageous t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32193732194 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21103728795 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561253561254 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.942232505 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.428571429 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0714285714 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21428571429 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151921253397 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522376405308 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680350302919 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090697618656 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711443255343 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.