TPO 41
The reading explained the power company opinion about imposing strict laws on the coal ash disposal and brings 3 different reason to support their ideas. In the lecture the lecturer argues about all of their claims and challenges them. She states that definitely new rules should be strictly adopted.
First, the reading claimes that rules are already in place and companies obey the rules. they should use liner to prevent any contamination to their environment and therfore there is no need for stricter rules. However, the professor illustrates that rules are for new company not for the old one. So, using liner is not sufficeint because in old feild there are significant damage and liner is not sufficient. leaking and contaminating of drinking water could be the result of it. so rules should be in place for old and new disposal areas.
Also, reading claims that stricter rules reduces the use of recycling coal ash which is used in many building materials because of costomer concern about hazardous materials. In the lecture, lecturer refutes this idea and brings an example to support her idea. she uses the example of murcury which is dangerous and has strict rules but has safe recycling and people use recycled mercury. Therefore, it is unlikely that people be afraid of using recycled coal ash as well.
Third, the professor agrees with the reading that strict rules will increase the price. However, she states that the increased cost are worth it. She brings the statistic of increase in cost of power of 15 million dollar which is high but per house hole it is only 1 percent increase. So , it worth it if people just pay 1 percent more in their bill but have a clean and safe environment.
- Venu Mars Moon Earth pressure space spacecraft other planets like Venus 15 kilometer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to older people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 63
- TPO 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- TPO 45 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives U 70
- TPO 43 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... in place and companies obey the rules. they should use liner to prevent any contami...
^^^^
Line 2, column 386, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'liners'?
Suggestion: liners
... feild there are significant damage and liner is not sufficient. leaking and contamin...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 411, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Leaking
...ant damage and liner is not sufficient. leaking and contaminating of drinking water cou...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
... brings an example to support her idea. she uses the example of murcury which is da...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1099.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97285067873 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48938698528 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552036199095 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6158246759 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5384615385 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84615384615 7.06452816374 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352140870216 0.272083759551 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122666171354 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644617380928 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214088676202 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082027752681 0.0443174109184 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.