Due to the Corona pandemic, lots of schools all over the world have implemented online learning during school closures. Some people think distance-learning programmes can never be as good as courses taken in person. Do you think this is a positive or negative development in education?
Since the Coronavirus has spread over the world, lots of schools allow their students to use the online courses during school closure. Although the virtual class has a positive influence on learning outcomes, there is more drawback compare to the traditional way.
On the one hand, distance learning is more convenient to access the lesson. By using the internet for transmission of knowledge will allow the student to be flexible in their time and places. For example, rural students can join the class without going hundreds of kilometers to their school. Moreover, distance learning would minimize stress for some students fall behind with their studies so they can learn at a suitable pace. In Asia, parents always caring about their child’s grades if the students can’t catch up with classmate will make parents depress so many of them send their child to study more and more extra class.
On the other hand, online learning in which missing communication and contact lead to a minor effect on students. We can recognize that learning via the internet doesn’t help students strengthen communication skills and critical thinking like face-to-face activities do. School is also the place to make friends and understand the relationship in society meanwhile study online can not do that. This can lead to a negative influence on shaping a child’s personality. Furthermore, without a study under supervision, students from every age will be attracted by stuff on the internet.
In conclusion, though deliver the lecture online become more popular, I believe the course taken in person is more effective. Online learning would be a temporary solution to cope with accidental hence the school has to focus more on traditional teaching styles.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-04-10 | Hoa Trang Nguyen | 89 | view |
- The chart below gives the information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 83
- Due to the Corona pandemic lots of schools all over the world have implemented online learning during school closures Some people think distance learning programmes can never be as good as courses taken in person Do you think this is a positive or negativ 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...positive influence on learning outcomes, there is more drawback compare to the tr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, then, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26690391459 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72706091522 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594306049822 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0710180597 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.714285714 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257319225223 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904252922177 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559930180949 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167002657463 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455309424195 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.