The school decides to give a bonus to teachers based on how effective they are. Who do you think should evaluate a teacher’s effectiveness?
-students
-other teachers
There are various ways by giving teachers a bonus at each school. One school choose the idea that teachers evaluate their colleges. In the opposite decision, students assess their teachers as the person who will earn their bonus. Some people claim that these ideas are so controversial because either other teachers or students spend a splendid time with the teacher. In my view, students should evaluate their teachers for their extra money because students know more about all of the features as assessments of their teachers.
To begin with, passionate about teaching by teachers are known by students. For one thing, passion for their lessons surely affects students’ attitudes. Therefore, grades depend on their heart. For example, one teacher feels so burning to teach English to their students. Then, they are able to feel that he is not an attractive person, so they focus on talking with their friends, doing other homework, or sleeping. Thus, their final score is gradually down to worse.
Second, students are enough to know teachers’ skills in teaching. Other teachers do not attend lectures of their colleges, so they do not know what their colleges use their teaching skills as effective for students. However, students have significant knowledge of teachers’ skills by attending classes. Take my self as an example, I impressed one of my high school lectures because of improving my English skills. She was able to speak English like native speakers, so she needed us to speak more fluently. Therefore, I could blush my English skills in her class.
Third, teachers will polish their teaching skills for assessment by students. To be more specific, they have to need visible effects like grades for students since students take their courses for graduation or future jobs. If teachers are not able to teach effectively and attractively, it will be not only a waste of time for students to attend their class but also the classes which do not take advantage of their future.
It is true that students should assess their teachers for extra money because of their enough knowledge of their teachers. There are three reasons for supporting my opinion. First, students know their teacher’s passion for teaching. Second, teaching skills by teachers affect their student's grades which relate to assessment. Third, evaluation by students urges their teachers to polish their teaching skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-13 | akimasa7887 | 61 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree It is better to travel abroad to visit different countries when you are younger rather than when you are older 66
- which do you think is the most important factor to improve people s work efficiencies 1 Having a work environment which is free of noise and distractions 2 Knowing that they will be rewarded 3 Doing jobs they are interested in 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is easier for people to maintain good health than before 66
- Some people think that some lessons for young children age 4 8 which include video games can serve as effective and interesting ways of learning while others think that these lessons are quite distracting and can be seen as a waste of time What is your op 40
- The company would like to invest in improving employees work Which way do you think is better to help employees become more adept to new technology to redesign the working environment to be more comfortable and spacious 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 476, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... money because students know more about all of the features as assessments of their teache...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, third, thus, for example, for one thing, in my view, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2031.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22107969152 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54087590861 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480719794344 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 579.6 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7760530973 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.24 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.56 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294288790134 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11355060304 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771889549616 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202779593371 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726672664044 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.