TPO-45
The reading is providing the points and the reasons of skeptics about the presence of bees 200 million years ago. The professor explaines that all the reasons in the reading are not-convincing and the presence of bees is quite possible in 200 million years ago.
First, she agrees that there is not any fossil of actual bees date back to 200 million years ago but it do not refute the possibility of presence of bees at that time. She clarifies that fossils were preseved by the tree's resin. In 200 million years ago this kind of trees were very rare. Therefore, it could be possible that there were bees at that time but not preserved as fossils because there were not any resin trees.
Also, professor states that it is true that flowering plant were not living at that time. It is possible that at that time bees were feeding on not flowering plants like ferns and pine trees and adapted to them. So, after presence of flowering plants they change their feeding style and their relationship with flowering plants became stable.
Lastly, the lecturer explaines that lack of spiral caps which protect the product of bees from water was provided by water proof substance and in fossilized structures this water proof materials are in favor of bees making them not any other insects. Therefore, the third reasons of the reading also was refuted by speaker.
- TPO 42 65
- TPO44 Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are relate 60
- franchise starting business benefit 73
- TPO 30 Writing IndependentDo you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 65
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 105, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'does'?
Suggestion: does
...te back to 200 million years ago but it do not refute the possibility of presence ...
^^
Line 2, column 216, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'trees'' or 'tree's'?
Suggestion: trees'; tree's
...ifies that fossils were preseved by the trees resin. In 200 million years ago this ki...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: waterproof
...duct of bees from water was provided by water proof substance and in fossilized structures ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 174, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: waterproof
...tance and in fossilized structures this water proof materials are in favor of bees making t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, lastly, so, therefore, third, kind of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75847457627 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30712070481 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483050847458 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 340.2 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8514212417 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.090909091 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387342583688 0.272083759551 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169070841158 0.0996497079465 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131251525704 0.0662205650399 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229473796335 0.162205337803 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161771214705 0.0443174109184 365% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 63.6247240618 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.