Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
In this connotation the author is saying about the belief of some people regarding the government funding for the arts area. I personally agree with the first statement of this connotation. As I belief government should support the arts area. In the below paragraphs I am going to explain my views on my agreement towards the first sentence.
Firstly, I believe government is for the people of nation. So, they should provide every support which can help the people to get their goals. It can be anything, by providing better facilities or by giving grants for the students who can not afford to study further because of financial crisis. Just like this, Government should have to be bias for every sector. Each sector should be same for them either it is science or any engineering or arts anything. It’s government responsibility to provide every benefit which can help to grow that sector.
Although there are some people who believe opposite of that, like by providing funding or any facilities can deteriorate the integrity of that field. Maybe they are saying that because they fill like by providing funding to arts will going to me catch more people towards that field which ultimately going to decline the value of that field. Because there is a chance of amalgam of people who even do not have any interest, yet they join that field only because that field going to provide them more opportunity in future in sense of by providing jobs or anything.
Still, I believe that only because of some numbers of advantage taking people, government should not stop their funding. Because there are so many people in the world who wants to do something in arts field but because of less opportunity in future, they overlap their dreams and just go with flow where they think they are going get more opportunity of better future. Arts is gift from GOD, not everyone can have that. There are small percentage of people who get this gift. So, if government support their talent by providing funding to the arts field, they can live their dreams and even more person can attract towards that field which indirectly good for nation’s economy also because as many as people can have jobs or business.
At the end, I want to conclude my view by mentioning that government should have to support each field by staying biased, they have to be supportive to public. Government can’t take the decision on the base of any suggestion without going in depth of the statement. And arts is something which can help the nation to have the identity in the world.
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station s coverage of weather and lo 54
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books We recommend that Monarch Books open a caf in its store Monarch having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years has a large customer base because it is 78
- A Nation should require all of its students to study the same national crriculum until they enter college 50
- Claim No act is done purely for the benefit of others Reason All actions even those that seem to be done for other people are based on self interest 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
...egarding the government funding for the arts area. I personally agree with the first...
^^^^
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...he first statement of this connotation. As I belief government should support the ...
^^
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: BELIEF_BELIEVE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'believe' (verb) instead of belief (noun)?
Suggestion: believe
...rst statement of this connotation. As I belief government should support the arts area...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
... I belief government should support the arts area. In the below paragraphs I am goin...
^^^^
Line 4, column 225, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'art'.
Suggestion: art
... they fill like by providing funding to arts will going to me catch more people towa...
^^^^
Line 4, column 235, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'go'
Suggestion: go
... like by providing funding to arts will going to me catch more people towards that fi...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 240, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...s field but because of less opportunity in future, they overlap their dreams and just go ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion to have the identity in the world.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, regarding, so, still, as for, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2121.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 442.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79864253394 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4660851425 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.423076923077 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 654.3 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8817051577 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0476190476 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61904761905 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307303992003 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116569166895 0.0831039109588 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811425301558 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195690884097 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371807876237 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.38706741573 83% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.