In many cities there is little control on the design and construction of new homes and office buildings, and people can build houses in their own style. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a situation?
It has been said that the diversity of cities allows its residents to construct their desire house without control. To me, everything has two side-affair. This essay will analyze the pros and cons of this situation.
Having been allowed to build their accommodation, the owner would have the ability to enhance their fertile imagination remarkably. Therefore, outstanding houses will have been built. The advent of self-built houses will open the floodgates to the development of tourist attraction which is the cornerstone of one’s country's sustainable economy. Additionally, one of the reasons people prefer to build their own houses in their style is because they want to maximize the use of their land. Some individuals believe that doing this will profitable to the owner and their wealth of creativity. Constructing a house without government permission obviously brings the owner state of euphoria, so the rate of happiness will surge up as well.
On the other hand, the government should take responsibility for considering the place establishment of a house or an office. In case the builder might not have academic qualifications in terms of architect specialize, the government’s presence is essential in order to ban that building process which will cause massive negative impacts on the surroundings. For instance, wooden houses are not appropriate to build up on some areas where usually suffer heavy rain or flood. As others try to follow building whatever they want, the outcome seems inevitable.
To sum up, building in control is fundamental to constructing freely. I personally think that the government should control the building process of a house.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-07 | hi.nguyn91 | 84 | view |
| 2020-07-19 | ngoctham4344 | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-19 | ngoctham4344 | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-25 | Thu Phuong Dang | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-25 | Trần Thanh Trúc | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It has been said that the diversity of c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntrys sustainable economy. Additionally, one of the reasons people prefer to buil...
^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rol the building process of a house.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, well, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48484848485 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04677342164 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602272727273 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.6454748381 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244478050837 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081401531885 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706069134677 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150016035892 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438294242631 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.