Some people say that it is more important for employers to consider academic qualifications rather than personal life experience and values when hiring an employee. Do you agree or disagree?
While some people believe that recruiters should choose candidates with high qualifications and good scores instead of considering their work experience and other personal values, I believe that, along with a degree, practical experiences can also prove the capability of applicants.
On the one hand, a degree can give recruiters more reliable and immediate evidence when choosing suitable staff for the company due to some reasons. Firstly, a good degree demonstrates that a person has a good academic background and has acquired the necessary skills and in-depth knowledge for a particular field. There are some jobs requiring employees to have high professional knowledge that can be only learned at universities, such as occupations in the medical or technological field. Secondly, the university environment also trains students’ essential soft skills which can be necessary for future jobs. For instance, most education systems in university create opportunities for students to take part in community activities to improve their teamwork skills or research skills, management skills, and so on.
On the other hand, I embrace the opinion that personal life experience and values are also important factors that most head hunters should consider before choosing suitable staff for their organizations. First of all, apparently, enrolling in a university and getting a degree seems to be easier for most students nowadays since there are more and more private universities established. This leads to a dramatic increase in the number of graduates with the same degrees. Thus, among a good many applicants having similar qualifications, in order to recruit the most competent employees, managers should take into account other outstanding strengths such as work experience and personalities. In fact, if a candidate has done part-time jobs or taken part in internship programs related to their majors, it is proved that whether they have passions and talents in such areas or not. Secondly, it is undeniable that some knowledge at university tends to be theoretical and scarcely relevant to practical jobs so most fresh employees need training before becoming official staff of companies. Therefore, hiring those whose experience is available helps companies to save time and cost to train them again.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-27 | hoaithuongnguyen | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-27 | hoaithuongnguyen | 56 | view |
| 2020-03-19 | chaunguyen2707 | 56 | view |
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work What could be the reasons for this Do you think it is a positive or a negative development 61
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss both the 73
- The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 89
- Some people think that everyone should aim to get white collar jobs while others believe there are advantages to blue collar jobs as well Discuss both views and give your opinions 81
- Some believe that people will purchase a product based on their needs and advertising is not needed To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...save time and cost to train them again.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in fact, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1957.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51267605634 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00738230752 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580281690141 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.0792271714 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.538461538 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3076923077 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3076923077 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186234134255 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615856254161 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493749771685 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12730882103 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00666282553402 0.056905535591 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.