Some people say that technologies such as mobile phones are disrupting social interaction. Do you agree or disagree?
Technological advancements have made human life more comfortable and easy to live and the invention of cell phones is one of them. In accord with some individuals this technology has a devastating effect on social interaction. However, this essay is in disagreement with the above-mentioned notion as in my view it has been changed because of the busy and hectic work schedule. The supporting reasons are explained in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, first of all, mobile technology has haven’t destroyed social communication instead it has altered it. Earlier people use to meet in each physical in order to communicate but now one can easily interact while sitting far away. The new smartphones have a built-in feature that allows one to know who was calling when his or her phone was switched off so that they can have words with the person later on. Furthermore, internet use in the mobile made it worth it as no one is out of reach now, Gmail can be checked and different platforms such as Facebook, Instagram and Whatsapp brought people sharing same interest from different country and culture together. For instance, in the research done by Toronto University it has been observed that 87 percent of the people believe that mobile has opened different ways to interact with their dear ones whom they cannot meet physically.
Furthermore, children and youngsters can now interact with their teacher and friend in order to ask queries after school hours. Tutors can make a group where they can share the homework and most importantly they can inform parents about the performance of the student on the phone. For instance, recently because COVID-19 colleges and schools all around the world are closed which is disrupting the study of the students but governments have asked teachers to interact with their students by phone and give them their homework so that study should not be affected by the adverse situations.
To conclude, people have become workaholics because of which interaction method has changed. Mobile invention has changed the way of interaction and has given an effective way to interact and remain in touch with loved ones.
- A friend has offered you some work in his company You are currently employed and not able to start for three months Write a reply to your friend In your letter Give details of what you know about his company Explain your current situation Give your answer 87
- You are going away to travel for the summer A friend will be looking after your house while you are away Write a letter to your friend In your letter say where you are going describe your house explain some of the things your friend must do to look after 73
- You live in a room in college which you share with another student However there are many problems with this arrangement and you find it very difficult to work Write a letter to the accommodation officer at the college In your letter describe the situatio 67
- Write a letter to your friend inviting him her to a music concert Please say Where and when does the concert start What type of music will be played there Why do you think your friend will enjoy it 73
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...th, first of all, mobile technology has haven’t destroyed social communication instea...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...stead it has altered it. Earlier people use to meet in each physical in order to co...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, while, for instance, such as, first of all, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07282913165 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75176689516 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585434173669 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.3226877802 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.357142857 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192206870028 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666401126983 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430334520679 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114228079702 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030953544529 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.