Some people say that technologies such as mobile phones is disrupting social interaction Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people say that technologies such as mobile phones is disrupting social interaction. Do you agree or disagree?

With the development of modern technologies, such as cell phones, some people claim that they may disrupt social interaction. While it seems reasonable, I do not agree with that point of view.

On the one hand, the reason why some people consider modern technology an obstacle to social interaction is because they believe more and more people are addicted to it. For instance, nowadays children are attracted by cell phones or computers, so that they prefer playing with them at home rather than going out and play with other people in person. Nevertheless, people lacking social interaction does not blame for technologies, instead their lack of self-discipline and self-control on the usage of technologies is the probably the main reason.

On the other hand, technology provides human beings with much more convenience and efficiency to interact with others. Hundreds of years ago when the telephone was not invented, people could communicate with each other merely by letters, which was extremely slow. However, people can contact their families, friends or colleagues within a few seconds and they can even have video chats together because of the development of cell phones and the Internet.

Moreover, with proper use, cell phones, computers and Internet could be the ideal tools for social interaction. Large numbers of business are accomplished through phone calls or web meetings. Customer service by phone or online chat are widespread throughout merchants. People can maintain daily contacts with each other and we can even make new friends on social media websites.

To conclude, as long as they are used in appropriate ways, technologies are excellent tools for social interaction, but not disruption.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-04-07 s4990 56 view
2022-01-13 lakhveer khokhar 67 view
2020-09-20 zack96 73 view
2020-05-31 wjl881219 78 view
2020-05-02 kjot_59 84 view
Essays by user wjl881219 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: THE_EXACTLY_THE[1]
Message: Duplicated 'the' in the phrase: 'the probably the'. Did you mean 'probably the'?
Suggestion: probably the
...control on the usage of technologies is the probably the main reason. On the other hand, tec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, while, for instance, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35661764706 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84713392812 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606617647059 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8792290102 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.076923077 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246179277274 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867063183941 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554177792636 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140247156263 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063302093381 0.056905535591 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.