The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007.
The line graph shows data about the number of cars per family in United Kingdom Between 1971 and 2007.
Overall, the ownership of vehicles in Britain increased over the period shown. A considerable rise can be seen in percentage of family with two cars and eventually overtook that for people without car.
In 1971, most families owned no cars, at about 48%, 5% higher than household with one car. Proportion of family with one car and two cars were lower, at around 44% and 8% respectively. Family with three or more cars had the lowest figure, at merely 1%.
From 1971 to 2007, there was no significant changes in the trend of family with one car which fluctuated between 45 % and 42% and became the most common type in UK. The biggest change was seen in family without can which fall gradually to approximately 24% but the group of two cars increase steadily to 25%. However, type of three or more cars saw a small rise to 7% for the whole period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | fdsugb22 | view | |
| 2023-06-14 | hieu13092006 | view | |
| 2022-10-12 | DOT BABA | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up to the minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts 56
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 61
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada 78
- the chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 789.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58720930233 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35710608151 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610465116279 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5250352625 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6666666667 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239599110732 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106811187575 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645727817323 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161815976488 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540585039186 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.