Although it’s a new technology, solar energy provides benefits to the entire world. First, solar energy eliminates our reliance on non-renewable fossil fuels. Additionally, solar energy is non-pollutant, which makes it better for everyone. Finally, there is almost no maintenance as solar panels have a long life span without regular maintenance. So, the benefits seem to be overwhelmingly positive and supportive of further production
The writer and the lecturer both argue the benefits of solar panel energy. The author claims solar energy only provides benefits while the professor argues that some points of building a solar energy panel might be not that environment-friendly but in the overall process, it will come with great benefits.
Firstly, according to the reading passage, solar energy reduces the dependency on fossil-fuels and unrenewable energy resources. The author adds solar energy could be the great replacement of current main energy resources since the consumption of it not bring any negative outcomes. On the other hand, even though the lecturer agrees with this claim made by the author, he also discusses that to be able to build a solar energy panel, a great amount of fossil fuel energy needed to be used, therefore, since the usage of fossil fuel will be involved the outcome will not cost a zero harm as it's mentioned on the reading passage. And he continues by saying this situation comes with question marks about the overall energy consumption type, whether it eliminates fossil fuel usage completely or not.
Secondly, the author claims that using solar energy would not create any pollution or harmful products. And he compares this zero side effects with the current energy source's negative outcomes such as unpleasant smell, sounds etc.. Meanwhile, the professor agrees with the mentioned reasons from the reading passage and he also adds that there will be greater tax benefits of using solar energy too.
Lastly, both the author and the lecturer agrees that the financial benefits of this particular energy sources would be crucially great since for building a solar panel is not costly and this panel can be used for a long period of time. The reading passage says, there will be financial benefits where the lecturer adds the financial benefits are amazingly compounded.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-13 | titoyos418 | 68 | view |
| 2024-04-13 | titoyos418 | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-02 | Nina Tsarevich | 85 | view |
| 2022-04-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 75 | view |
| 2022-04-01 | birkiy | 68 | view |
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones cell phones with Internet access while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch Which point of view do you think is better and why 71
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones cell phones with Internet access while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch Which point of view do you think is better and why 76
- smart cars 60
- Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Smart Cars 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...mes such as unpleasant smell, sounds etc.. Meanwhile, the professor agrees with th...
^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...y and this panel can be used for a long period of time. The reading passage says, there will b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 308.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12337662338 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54428644017 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480519480519 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 496.8 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.428363012 49.2860985944 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.454545455 110.228320801 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 21.698381199 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295005194393 0.272083759551 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14746524703 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667182376077 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205351310055 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566380470203 0.0443174109184 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.3589403974 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.