Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The revolutionary advancement in modern technology has endowed people with substantial resources for their survival in the best possible way. The availability of a variety of facilities has enabled people to choose inalienable beneficial opportunities to adopt in their lives. However, there are sections of society that cannot afford even basic necessities. For them these choices are out of reach, hence I partially agree with the view. This essay will shed some light on ideas and examples.
In the present era, human beings have exponentially increased the number of options to avail in different fields like food, transport, and business due to many reasons. Firstly, the creative methods to produce a variety of food and its preservation have benefitted the human population with the provision of significant types of edibles during the entire year. For instance, non-seasonal can be bought from the food market irrespective of the weather conditions due to modernized preservation methods. Secondly, while traveling, we can opt for many choices, according to affordability and convenience, due to inventions of faster ways of transportation leading to a revolution in transport hubs. Furthermore, the advancement in education and development has endowed people with the availability of an enormous number of professional fields to succeed in their lives.
On the other hand, however, there is an unequal distribution of positive aspects of technology. Many underdeveloped countries are lacking the basic necessities to survive like food, health, and financial resources. Instead of having choices, they do not have an option to avail the fundamental human rights. To illustrate, the research data by an organization shows that 45% of the population does not have access to clean water supply; 35% of people are spending a substandard life. Moreover, certain jobs and study courses are limited to developed countries only, leaving other devoid of these advantages. Furthermore, having too many choices can make us feel uncertain about what we should choose, which leads to time-consuming. If we only have one option, we will not have to compare two different things and we can directly jump to the conclusion of what should we get. In this way, we can save lots of precious time which we can use to do other things.
In conclusion, although it seems clear that people are living conveniently with a lot of opportunities, it's indisputable that having too many choices can cause them to waste time and have no certain goal in their career. We have to be careful before making a decision on choosing a particular product, which is an ill effect of technological and industrial advancement in recent years.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge Write a 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to even'
Suggestion: to even
... sections of society that cannot afford even basic necessities. For them these choic...
^^^^
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...ions of society that cannot afford even basic necessities. For them these choices are out of reac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...nderdeveloped countries are lacking the basic necessities to survive like food, health, and finan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2286.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 432.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29166666667 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1016410929 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560185185185 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 723.6 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5454934523 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.3 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274729601778 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742376058283 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592471193545 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160896131559 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521907812077 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.