Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of one international organisation rather than each national government. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that handling environmental issues belongs to transnational organizations while others believe that protecting surroundings should be the duty of each individual nation. In my view, I agree that having one global organization specializing in solving environmental problems can be beneficial, but we should not exclude the governments' responsibility.
On the one hand, I think it is necessary for every country's authority to deal with their own green issues. Although an environmental problem may look alike, in different regions it stems from various causes that need different approaches and solutions. For example, while Alaska, the USA is facing desertification caused by deforestation and over-exploitation of resources, desertification in Beijing, China is the result of accelerated urbanization. Hence, these two countries need to apply distinct methods to their own difficulties, which calls for the liability and intervention of the government.
On the other hand, having one international organization to solve environmental problems around the world allows countries to find a common voice in protecting habitat and enhancing greater cooperation between nations. It is a fact that third world countries do not own advanced technologies and lack of experience to clear up every matter. For example, countries like Sudan and Ethiopia have to face many issues besides environmental ones, such as political instability, starvation and wars...They do not have enough resources and abilities to invest fully in environmental protection projects. Thus, to develop effective solutions to green issues, they need international support, especially from developed countries, which can be attained through global organizations.
In conclusion, although it is good to have a transnational organization to assist with solving environmental issues, the authority's role remains crucial in ensuring thorough resolution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-11 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
| 2020-05-11 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 56 | view |
- The line graph shows three different crimes in England and Wales in 1970-2005. 73
- The chart gives information about the percentage of overweight men and women in Australia from 1980 to 2010 100
- The percentage of female members of parliament in European countries 2000 2012 92
- The maps below show information about the change of Riverage college 30 years ago and now 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions from 1980 to 2010 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...neficial, but we should not exclude the governments responsibility. On the one hand, I t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
...ical instability, starvation and wars...They do not have enough resources and abilit...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, if, look, may, so, third, thus, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.94265232975 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.53617971856 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616487455197 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.3683453437 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.727272727 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2727272727 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221404773447 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804904872247 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793098648695 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136668777115 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104363729947 0.056905535591 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.47 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.