In some countries, small town-centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out-of-town stores. As a result, people without cars have limited access to out-of-town stores, and it may result in an increase in the use of cars. Do you think the disadvantages of this change outweigh its advantages?
In many nations over the world, small stores cannot emulate large shops that based on the outskirts, therefore, many of those small businesses have been standing in front of bankrupt. That leads to a number of consequences, including a rise in car usage in these countries and the ability to access to large out-of-town stores for people who have no cars. In my perspective, I believe that this tendency is more harmful than useful.
To begin with, why people like shopping in big shops? I think that the first problem is the price. The expense of renting a space in the city or town centre, especially in huge cities, is very expensive. Thence, many commodities there are sold for more than the actual value of the product. Secondly, due to goods in mini shops not being diverse so residents will be limited in their selection. This causes an uncomfortable feeling and makes shopping becoming a bore.
On the other hand, if dwellers want to approach great stores far from their home, they will have to use means of transport, mostly cars. For that reason, the demand for using automobiles for long-distance travel will increase significantly. Traffic jams will become worse because of the higher number of vehicle on streets. Furthermore, the quantity of pollutions emitted from car engines will grow, which heightens pollution levels in those place and adversely affect human health.
Nevertheless, this trend is not absolutely bad. Shopping in broad areas will be a perfect chance for walking to enhance physical health. Besides, many psychologists show that shopping is one of the most effective ways to reduce stress. In addition, they can add some activities else into their trips, such as camping with their family or friends.
In conclusion, with the reasons aforementioned above, this tendency towards shopping large shops located away from city centres is having many negative impacts. Although it could bring health benefits, I still trust that pros cannot overwhelm cons.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, hence, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, well, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1226993865 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67127019305 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644171779141 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0520437055 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8947368421 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1578947368 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.68421052632 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222836497828 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052543651099 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736272198821 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112296965775 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0905541965905 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.