The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005
The two diagrams illustrate some changes that happened at a seaside resort of Templeton in the 1990-2005 period.
At first glance, while in 1990, this place was a residential area, after 15 years, it became an industrial area with many commercial facilities and transportation options. In addition, away from some additional facilities, some construction sites and trees were disappeared to enhance the living conditions here.
It is noticeable that the apartment complex and a factory were constructed on either side of Templeton resort until 2005. In addition, transport systems were improved by building an airport and broadening a ferry railway which ran along the East to the West. Besides, people living in this resort could enjoy a big supermarket in the West of the left area, which was built until 2005.
The two diagrams also show that some households in the South on the left side are relocated to the centre of it to have more space for three apartments and a supermarket. All trees on the right area were cut down for industrial sites and transportation. Also, although there was a big house on the North of the left side in 1990, there was no longer present in 205, and instead, we can see the addition of two apartment complexes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-29 | hoang tuan minh | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-13 | minhngoc_8 | 61 | view |
| 2022-04-13 | minhngoc_8 | 61 | view |
| 2022-04-13 | minhngoc_8 | 61 | view |
| 2022-04-13 | minhngoc_8 | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 87
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 78
- The chart and table below give information about healthcare resources and life expectancy in different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he addition of two apartment complexes.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, so, while, in addition, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92417061611 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80931941142 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587677725118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4882274061 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.444444444 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188360502858 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823032767812 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105167080941 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143105662061 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122430512386 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.