tpo36 integrated writing
Based on reading and listening, cloud seeding is one of the best ways to prevent crops from damaging in the united state, which mentioned in the text, but it is highly contradictory to the lecture.
First of all, the writer makes that point that laboratory experiments have shown that silver iodide can help to change the hail to water vapor. However, the professor demonstrates the different idea that somehow using silver iodide has some side effects such as lack of water. When they use this element, they prevent forming snow.
Secondly, the belief in the reading is that Asian countries have good experience using this technique to control the damage that has occurred with hail. Still, the lecturer says that we can't compare Asian countries to the united state. They are applying this experience in their cities, which has polluted. Still, in the united state, we need to check whether experience works in farming land with no pollution because pollution somehow interacts with cloud seeding, which may not answer in unpolluted areas.
Thirdly, the author states that local studies have proved in the central united state cloud seeding reduced hail damage by monitoring the crop damage due to hail. In contrast, the speaker refutes that. She believes it maybe this kind of result is from a natural variation that happened once only and is not because of cloud seeding.
- tpo 49 integrated writing 11
- TPO 36 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universit 61
- Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader 63
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time 60
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 23 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 12
No. of Words: 229 250
No. of Characters: 1120 1200
No. of Different Words: 133 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.89 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.891 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.291 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 79 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 57 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 29 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.818 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.104 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.818 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.347 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.347 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.1 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 4