The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph compares average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in 4 countries: United Kingdom (the UK), Sweden, Italy and Portugal from 1967 to 2007. It can be clearly seen that although at first the UK and Sweden were two countries that have the highest CO2 emissions, as the years went by the figures for that in the 2 countries had the tendency of decreasing. In contrast, CO2 emissions in Italy and Portugal gradually were gradually increasing in the same period of time.
In 1967, the UK and Sweden’s people emit the most CO2 emissions: 12 metric tonnes and 10 metric tonnes respectively. The CO2 emissions of Italy and Portugal were far more less than that: over 4 metric tonnes & less than 2 metric tounnes correspondingly. In the following years, while CO2 emission of the UK was gradually decreasing the figures of that for Sweden, Italy and Portugal were rising quite rapidly.
In 1977, CO2 emissions in Sweden hit its peak at over 10 metric tonnes and began to drop sharply. After 1977, CO2 emissions in the UK continued to decline slightly while the figures of that in Italy and Portugal were increasing gradually.
After the drop of CO2 emissions in Sweden starting from 1977, the figure for that began to fall less rapidly after reaching 7 metric tonnes in 1987 and continued to decline until it hit a peak of about 5 metric tonnes in 2007. Starting from 1987, while CO2 emissions in Italy and Portugal were rising and hit their peaks of 8 metric tonnes and 5 metric tonnes in 2007 CO2 emissions in the UK continued to decline slowly until it hit a bottom of about 9 metric tonnes in the same year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-10 | tramnguyenngoc0911@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Which is more important when choosing a job salary or job satisfaction 73
- CAM11 TEST 4 The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two pe 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 463, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...y were gradually increasing in the same period of time. In 1967, the UK and Sweden’s people e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 166, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'less' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: less
...missions of Italy and Portugal were far more less than that: over 4 metric tonnes & less ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en hit its peak at over 10 metric tonnes and began to drop sharply. After 1977, C...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 286.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66783216783 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52193090466 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.416083916084 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 400.5 283.868780488 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.4583987063 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.5 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223057762839 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129241086467 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123234713662 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166650825063 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080023576194 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.