Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.
No one can deny the importance of educational background in people's living standards. In this regard, people's opinions are divided as to whether coaches were more appreciated and valued by society in the past or not. It is my firm conviction that nowadays teachers have a strong social level more than the past. For a number of reasons and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
My primary reason is that today pursuing educational approach has a critical role between people in society. Consequently, people also spend more attention and appreciated teachers than before. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own experience. You see, my family has a long resume in teaching and we were coach for decades. My grandma all the time talks about her experience as a teacher and claims that in that time most of the people interested in training children as workers in their fields and also, they didn't consider any meaning for knowledge. So, as you can see, it is certainly clear why I think today teachers have more worthful position than before.
Second, I believe that these days the governments prepare more programs for attention toward teachers and also raising their salary for tempting creative youth to be teacher in the future. For instance, there are numerous amount of TV shows and movies for spreading awareness about the value of teaching and knowledge. Moreover, people annually celebrate Teacher's Day and these kinds of events are a symbol for caring and appreciating teachers.
In light of the above-mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that today teachers have more influence and attention in society. Not only for people's trend toward science and knowledge but also because of the government and their followers in investment and making a powerful site for teachers in society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-14 | Vivian Chang | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | Crash | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-25 | can111 | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | reza_fattahi | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | minammah | 73 | view |
- The reading passage states that humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding or mating purposes and they have ability to navigate by stars However the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the points made in the reading 76
- Debates as to the story of the burning mirror that the greek navy used to attack the roman 60
- problems with farming tuna fish 70
- huge houses of Chaco s people 80
- traveling to their own country 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...is regard, peoples opinions are divided as to whether coaches were more appreciated and value...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 561, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... workers in their fields and also, they didnt consider any meaning for knowledge. So,...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...uture. For instance, there are numerous amount of TV shows and movies for spreading aw...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, moreover, second, so, as to, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 308.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07467532468 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73549125018 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561688311688 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7950555289 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.2 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221321828236 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081003025412 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771464211109 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140138133056 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610684147019 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.