Some schools prefer to teach specialised subjects to students after the age of 15, while others suggest that all the subjects should be taught throughout school life. What are the benefits of these 2 approaches? Which one is better, in your opinion?
Notions are altering on whether teen age learners in schools should obtain the knowledge of all subjects or is it essential to consciousness up to subjects. Merits of both nepotisms are mentioned in the ensuing paragraphs. Certainly, what I assume is that later view is a rational phenomena which requires to be opted.
To embark with, almost every intermediate student will become scientist. Because of each specialised subject has a huge chunk of knowledge, children acquire certain and infinite details. Probably, they will mould a lavish economy system of their nation. For example, in Paris, only selected subjects be it science is being taught to children, hence they will begin some scientific researches which provide the fullest experience of science to them. Eventually, it would appropriate for those who have dreamed to get white colour job.
However, when it comes to mould overall image of academics career, other subjects should be taught. In other words, children must fond of an information which pertains to every subject because for genius man, it is paramount to have variety of knowledge and this could only possible if they learn all subjects. For instance, for every doctors physical fitness is as essential as their mental capability. Nevertheless if they were not taught physical education subject at school, they would not capable of recommend any body related medicine to their patient. In addition, instead of emphasising on eminent certain subjects, teen learners should learn some other widespread subjects, ranging from G.K to social science. Consequently, they will know how the culture and custom their county has, even though they are not palmist.
In conclusion, despite minor benefit of learning only selected subjects at schools, I would apprise that studying all subjects is rational to retain fitness level to the best and cognisance traditions of nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-01 | Shivam patel | 61 | view |
- A large amount of advertisements are now targeted at children Many people say this has negative effects on children and should therefore be banned To what extant do you agree or disagree 67
- The chart shows use of social media by men and women in Austrelia in 2007 and 2014 66
- The graph below gives information about U.S government spending on research between 1980 and 2008. 78
- The process shows how carbon made in the environment 56
- The diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminium drinks cans
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: teenage
Notions are altering on whether teen age learners in schools should obtain the k...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'phenomenon'?
Suggestion: phenomenon
...assume is that later view is a rational phenomena which requires to be opted. To em...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 405, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...s essential as their mental capability. Nevertheless if they were not taught physical educat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 516, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anybody'?
Suggestion: anybody
...ol, they would not capable of recommend any body related medicine to their patient. In a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 699, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...her widespread subjects, ranging from G.K to social science. Consequently, they w...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72750598329 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6948913091 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.2 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232493424245 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070372229696 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613910065556 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141971471205 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269435587458 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.