The chart illustrates average CO2 emissions per person in four European countries between 1975 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparison where relevant.
The chart illustrates the average measurement of CO2 being emitted per person in four countries in the continent of Europe in the year of 1975 and 2015.
Overall, France still emitted the highest amount of CO2 between those years. Started with nearly 12 metric tons in the beginning of 1975 and decreased steadly over 40 years and reached the lowest peak of more than 8 metric tons. The second highest measurement of CO2 emissions belonged to Norway. In 1975, Norway produced slightly over 8 metric tons, however, Norway experienced fluctuations as the number rose rapidly to approximately 10 metric tons within 10 years. Moreover, the amount of CO2 also fell to around 7 metric tons and kept decreasing until 2015 with less than 6 metric tons of CO2 emissions.
The remaining two countries, which were Spain and Greece, had similar CO2 emissions growth. Both of the countries set things first with around 4 and 1 metric tons respectively. The former country, Spain, faced rapid increase of amount and in 2015, Spain became the second highest country which emitted the most CO2. Nevertheless, the latter remained as the country with lowest average of CO2 emissions (gave nearly 6 metric tons per person to the atmosphere in late 2015).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-14 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
- Some parents believe that extra private lessons outside school hours where students work alone with teacher can help them to do better at school Others disagree What are the advantages and disadvantages of private tuition 66
- In many parts of the world water sources are becoming more polluted What are the consequences of this problem What can be done to combat it 86
- The table shows existing and projected changes in the proportion of people over 65 in the populations of three countries from 2015 to 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 43
- The chart illustrates average CO2 emissions per person in four European countries between 1975 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 83
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the lowest'.
Suggestion: with the lowest
...ess, the latter remained as the country with lowest average of CO2 emissions gave nearly 6 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99033816425 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58153692399 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545893719807 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2761629724 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.3 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212049344026 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101801351422 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994353305314 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204572835741 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114494988426 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.