TPO-27
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Everyone is aware of the fact that jobs are essential for sustaining life. In a family, at least one person should have some sort of earnings to maintain it. A lot of people have distinct views regarding which job they should accept, whether a secure job or a satisfying job. However, as far as I'm concerned, I will wait to get a profession that is more satisfying. I can explain two rationals for the support of my claim, which I elaborate upon hereunder.
To begin with, if a job is satisfying, then only they can sustain in that. On the other hand, those who pick a secure job, it is not certain how much time they can stay in the job due to lack of experience, interest, or boredom. My newly recruited dental assistant is a compelling example of this situation. In my dental clinic, we are short of assistants due to the global pandemic-COVID-19. Hence, In her resume, it is stated that she is a business graduate. While during her interview, I recognized that she had excellent communication skills and well mannered, which are the basic attributes of a person who works as a dental assistant. Hence, I appointed her. Initially, she was proper and never failed in dealing with patients. Later on, I felt that she have less interest in the profession. Furthermore, she states that she had lost her job as a business employe in a private firm due to the pandemic and in search of his job hunt, she saw the advertisement for the dental assistant. She was attracted by the benefits, salary, and full-time hours. Eventually, I fired her because she made an inconvenience with patients. Through this instance, it is clear that a satisfying job is better than a secure one.
Next, a satisfying job provides us self-esteem than unfamiliar jobs. The interest motivates them to work hard to improve their abilities that inturn brings heights to their career. For instance, after my graduation, I set up a dental clinic. To improve my speaking skills I took additional classes and my dealing with patients attracted a lot of customers to my clinic. I improved my practical skills and tried to give the best outcome to the patients. I can affirm that due to my constant interest in dentistry, I was able to do hard work to improve my skills. Thus, I got the best clinician award last year. This raised my self-esteem.
All in all, I vehemently assure that selecting a satisfying job even if it took quite a bit of time is much better than going behind opportunities for secure jobs. Not only people can sustain in that job but also they can ameliorate self-esteem.
- Pets are considered as family members 73
- A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature novels plays and poems than they used to This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public for culture in general and for the futur 81
- robots are superior to astronauts 83
- TPO 21Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...or a satisfying job. However, as far as Im concerned, I will wait to get a profess...
^^
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...n hereunder. To begin with, if a job is satisfying, then only they can sustain in that. On...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, regarding, so, then, thus, well, while, at least, for instance, sort of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 43.0788530466 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2115.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67920353982 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87207597137 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519911504425 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 23.0 9.59856630824 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4868805911 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5357142857 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1428571429 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.32142857143 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213176387343 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556794126854 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642308909571 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150391352624 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768928920163 0.0645574589148 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.