Some say that students with similar academic abilities should be put in one class. Others believe a class should include students with different academic performances. Discuss.
These days, in most schools, there is an own classification which mainly depends on academic performances to arrange students into classes. On the other hand, many people argue that it’s a good choice to group students randomly as a class including students with different academic abilities can be positive and good for pupils. I will discuss this problem in two perspectives in my essay.
On the first hand, a class including pupils with similar academic abilities can decrease the studying pressure as students don't need to compete too much to keep their ranks or keep up with their peers. This can make studying more comfortable and enjoyable with students. Besides, this arrangement makes it easier for students to discuss or teamwork as there is not too much academic differences between members. Furthermore, the educators can teach more effectively when everyone is at the same level, they don’t have to pay too much concentration in students’ differences and be able to ensure that no one is left behind. Nevertheless, this arrangement can create some certain disadvantages, for example, this may make students lack motivation and hardly make any progress because they may be not really competitive - which can be easily solved in a class which has students with different abilities.
Classes comprising pupils with distinct learning abilities can have many advantages. Firstly, it’s undeniable that this will create a motivation for everyone to make relenting effort and compete enthusiastically to keep up with their peers. More specifically, one may try to study hard in order to keep up the pace with a better student. And this competition is usually considered positive as everyone all makes great progress. Also, studying in this type of class can create a precious opportunity for one who wants to enhance the horizon of knowledge as he or she is capable of acquiring new comprehension from the more excellent students. The better one can point out the drawback of one other and then everyone can improve the weakness and make a positive movement. Nonetheless, this kind of class can make it hard for teachers to take notice of each student and the differences between them, and moreover, some students may have to suffer heavy pressure to keep up with friends in classes.
From the points above, it can be clearly seen that each arrangement has its own pros and cons, therefore, each school should adjust and have an own appropriate arrangement. However, from my point of view, the school should organize classes which comprise students having different learning abilities but not a huge distinction in order to create maximum opportunities for pupils to make progress and compete. To put it in a nutshell, each class mode has its own advantages and disadvantages so the schools should make the best and most apporiate arrangement for pupils.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-09 | pluffyerriv | 64 | view |
- Your character is strongly influenced by the place where you grew up In what ways can growing up in a city or a countryside influence one s character What is your view 89
- Are women suitable to become police officers Give your reasons and examples 73
- Some say that students with similar academic abilities should be put in one class Others believe a class should include students with different academic performances Discuss 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 124, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...rease the studying pressure as students dont need to compete too much to keep their ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, really, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 7.85571142285 280% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2404.0 1615.20841683 149% => OK
No of words: 468.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13675213675 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88420969793 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474358974359 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 745.2 506.74238477 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.1693914016 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.555555556 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88888888889 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368079414758 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123380789451 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838963157504 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246730672926 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714678532832 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.