Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.
The author of the statement stated that the politicians should avoid those ideals that are difficult to achieve instead of they should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus. Many of us will argue that this will hold all the time, while others will counter this. In my essay, I will highlight both the side of the argument and will provide sound reasoning for the same.
Politicians are those who run the country in every aspect be it economy, defense, education, and many more. They are the ones who are responsible for taking corrective measures for all their country as well as globally related issues. So, they should have principles that they have to follow and work accordingly keeping in mind that their principles or desires won't compromise the country's requirement and safety. Here the question the ideals or principle pursued by the politician should be common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.
First, if a politician has elusive ideals than he will either destroy the country or will make the country best in the world as on any cost he wants to fulfill his desire and achieve his goal, for example, like in the past Hitler and Stalin did to the world and their own country. Hitler's desire was to make the Germany world power such that no one catch match and in order to achieve it he put the whole world into the war, the war known as second world war that took millions or millions of life and putting the world into danger. He may take another way to achieve his goals which would be beneficial for not only his own country but for the world also. But, as we know every coin has two faces this too has. The biggest advantage of having an elusive ideal is that you will be continuously working on it until and unless you achieve, for example, Martin Luther King, he has the elusive ideal during the time when he was protesting for the right of the African American and succeed in it.
Moreover, if a politician has to pursue common ground and reasonable consensus, then he might have compromised his ideals for the money and cloud create anarchy in the country or he might be stick to his path and ideology and work accordingly, like Indian Freedom Fighter Mahatma Gandhi did for the Independence of his country from Britisher. He sticks to non-violence and many other things to bring independence to his country and through his continuous efforts in August 1947, India becomes an independent country. But this took many decades to achieve his goal. So, according to me, this approach is good and effective and not the best one.
In sum, we can say that if a politician has elusive ideal than he might create a problem to his, and if he has common ground and reasonable consensus than also there is a chance that he would create a problem or this approach will take time. A better approach could be if they can follow something in-between of both approaches.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 652, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... only his own country but for the world also. But, as we know every coin has two fac...
^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...American and succeed in it. Moreover, if a politician has to pursue common gro...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, well, while, as to, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 33.0505617978 185% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2406.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 512.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69921875 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4317057283 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4765625 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 746.1 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.2949883548 60.3974514979 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.666666667 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4444444444 23.4991977007 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289155624178 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108598821094 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.190586915036 0.0758088955206 251% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192810135783 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829498604007 0.0667264976115 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.