Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.
The issue suggests that the politicians should seek common ground and reasonable consensus than ambiguous ideals. There might be some objections that since the world know is created by persuing ideals, it is a nonsense to be overlooked by politicians. However, there are many cases that persued only the ideal rather than life related acts failed. Moreover, because the politicians were elected by people, it might be unreasonable to follow the ideal. Therefore I agree with the issue.
Admittedly, the world today is a result of numerous fight between ideologies. For example, in the 19th to 20th century, it was a fight between imperialism and republic. Moreover, in the 20th to 21th century, it was a fight between Capitalism and Communism. Whatever the ideal is, human society was created between these ideals. On to that, in the book of Sapiens, the enormous human society were made because of these ideals created. Therefore it might be a contradiction for politicians not to persue ideals.
However, there are many cases in history that persuing only the ideal led to catastrophic ending. In the case of Soviate Union for example, Stalin, a dictator of this country, followed only the ideology, the Communism. Due to his excessive persue on his ideal, the country collapsed due to lack of understanding demotic needs. Moreover, in the case of North Korea, we can see definately that the result of following only the ideal is a calamity.
On the other point of view, the fundamental of politicians are made by normal people. They were elected by these pedestrian people. They are the representatives of every citizens in each part of their nation. Therefore, it is reasonable to weigh more on the public needs than his or her ideals. As a matter of fact, politicians are the tools for each individual in the nation. And these tools are made to increase the efficiency of the country's well-being, and is therefore obligatory to fulfill their needs.
In conclusion, it is understandable that the society today are made because of the ideal. However, without fulfilling the public need and deriving consensus, the politician cannot maintain its reason for its existance. Therefore, politicians should consider common ground and reasonable consensus than equivocal ideals.
- According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actu 60
- If the government is somewhat underfunded economically which part or two of the city could be cut Reduce the redundancy of personnel in the city hall Replace the plants that require frequent maintenance in the park lawn with plants that do not require fre 60
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes 50
- The following appeared in a newsletter offering advice to investors Three years ago because of flooding at the Western Palean Wildlife Preserve 100 lions and 100 western gazelles were moved to the East Palean Preserve an area that is home to most of the s 55
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station s coverage of weather a 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 453, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ht be unreasonable to follow the ideal. Therefore I agree with the issue. Admittedly, th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 434, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...e made because of these ideals created. Therefore it might be a contradiction for politic...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 371.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87359096093 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469002695418 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.5743980937 60.3974514979 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.5 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4583333333 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04166666667 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275577325319 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774093351439 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121812279101 0.0758088955206 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170609977355 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135550323627 0.0667264976115 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.